TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @re1nae

Fake engagement check for @re1nae

reinae — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-20.

хочу быть твоим фанатом) по рекламе - https://t.me/reinaegls

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-20
Subscribers
11,694
Median views
7,038
ERR
60.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs
Post language Russian
Channel age 8 months

Assessment summary

An abnormal view variance with a factor of 5.0 and the purging of over 80% of recent posts point to artificial feed boosting for giveaways. With comments disabled, high reach relies on isolated spikes, making the actual return on a paid publication unpredictable.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 7 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 6,183 to 14,170 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 7 of 7
60.2% for @re1nae similar channels median: 28.4%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 4 of 7
3.29 for @re1nae similar channels median: 3.26

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-20
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @re1nae assessment dated 2026-09-20 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 11,694 subscribers, median post views were 7,038, ERR was 60.2%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 3,519–6,887 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 4 more are too fresh.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

Spike in paid (Stars) reactions on posts (up to 640 stars)

On certain posts, paid (Stars) reactions are drastically higher than on others — up to 640 stars (≈11% of post views), even though free reactions are also enabled in the channel. This typically indicates targeted star boosting. Caveat: Telegram counts stars, not users — such a spike could also come from a single generous subscriber.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Apr 26 to Sep 20. The dashed line is the median (7,038).

0568K1.1MApr 26: 4,499 viewsApr 26: 5,400 viewsMay 1: 5,702 viewsMay 14: 4,565 viewsMay 14: 5,864 viewsMay 18: 4,888 viewsMay 22: 4,840 viewsMay 22: 5,024 viewsJun 4: 7,871 viewsJun 16: 7,865 viewsJun 16: 5,190 viewsJun 26: 6,955 viewsJul 7: 7,192 viewsJul 7: 6,365 viewsJul 7: 7,647 viewsJul 15: 8,051 viewsJul 15: 8,480 viewsJul 20: 10,550 viewsJul 25: 10,408 viewsJul 27: 9,399 viewsJul 27: 8,602 viewsJul 27: 9,710 viewsJul 27: 8,408 viewsAug 5: 10,474 viewsAug 5: 9,042 viewsAug 21: 12,599 viewsSep 1: 13,384 viewsSep 1: 11,689 viewsSep 15: 1,136,998 viewsSep 19: 7,180 viewsSep 19: 7,073 viewsSep 19: 7,003 viewsSep 19: 6,771 viewsSep 19: 5,737 viewsSep 19: 5,971 viewsSep 19: 4,771 viewsSep 20: 3,272 viewsSep 20: 2,084 viewsSep 20: 2,080 viewsSep 20: 2,083 views Apr 26Sep 20

Maximum: 1,136,998 views. Data as of Sep 20.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 19: index 50, grade DSep 19Sep 20: index 50, grade DSep 20
Run a fresh check for @re1nae

Data from 2026-09-20 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @re1nae and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @re1nae

Questions about @re1nae

Is it worth buying ads in this channel?

Placement is considered questionable due to a medium risk of manipulation (score 50 out of 100). The channel shows signs of targeted reaction purchases and the deletion of most publications.

How many real views will a publication get?

The median stands at 7 thousand views, but metrics fluctuate significantly from post to post. Due to a lack of advertising data, you cannot rely on a stable result.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

The reason is the risk of manipulation: part of the views may be artificial. Unstable statistics and disabled comments make it impossible to verify the presence of a loyal audience.

Similar channels in Blogs

All channels in Blogs

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @re1nae