TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @darkrezet

Fake engagement check for @darkrezet

DarkRezet — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-08.

https://blgr.lc/darkrezet tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@darkrezet instagram: https://www.instagram.com/darkrezet vk: https://vk.com/darkrezet ripp: https://rozetkadigital.ru/ripp/@darkrezet

91/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
110
Median views
113
ERR
102.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @darkrezet assessment dated 2026-08-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 110 subscribers, median post views were 113, ERR was 102.7%, and the cleanliness index was 91/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

There are not enough posts for a reach forecast.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @darkrezet

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-08. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @darkrezet

Questions about @darkrezet

What does grade A+ mean for @darkrezet?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @darkrezet?

ERR is 102.7%. Median post views equal 102.7% of the channel's 110 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 91/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @darkrezet