TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @darkrezet

@darkrezet: statistics and cleanliness index

https://blgr.lc/darkrezet tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@darkrezet instagram: https://www.instagram.com/darkrezet vk: https://vk.com/darkrezet ripp: https://rozetkadigital.ru/ripp/@darkrezet

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-09
Subscribers
107
Median views
67
ERR
62.6%
Posts sampled
39

Data from 2026-09-09 — 29 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is a musician's personal microblog with a very compact yet active audience, where more than half of the subscribers regularly view publications.

The risk of bot activity is minimal; however, an advertiser should consider the absolute scale: a post will receive an average of about 67 views, so placing ads here is suitable for targeted collaborations within the related music scene rather than for mass reach.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 12 Music catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 19 to 308,837 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 7 of 12
@darkrezet 62.6%
similar channels median 23.1%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 11 of 12
@darkrezet 8.01
similar channels median 2.9

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 39 posts with views, from Jul 27 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (67).

076152Jul 27: 152 viewsJul 31: 141 viewsAug 5: 107 viewsAug 8: 111 viewsAug 8: 120 viewsAug 13: 83 viewsAug 13: 93 viewsAug 13: 90 viewsAug 16: 63 viewsAug 16: 63 viewsAug 17: 72 viewsAug 19: 73 viewsAug 19: 70 viewsAug 21: 55 viewsAug 21: 57 viewsAug 21: 65 viewsAug 21: 76 viewsAug 22: 80 viewsAug 22: 77 viewsAug 22: 75 viewsAug 22: 73 viewsAug 22: 80 viewsAug 29: 61 viewsAug 29: 62 viewsAug 30: 96 viewsAug 31: 54 viewsAug 31: 56 viewsSep 1: 65 viewsSep 2: 66 viewsSep 2: 67 viewsSep 2: 67 viewsSep 2: 66 viewsSep 2: 67 viewsSep 4: 101 viewsSep 6: 50 viewsSep 6: 23 viewsSep 6: 21 viewsSep 8: 18 viewsSep 8: 15 views Jul 27Sep 8
  • post views
  • median 67

Maximum: 152 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 8: index 91, grade A+Aug 8Sep 9: index 97, grade A+Sep 9

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @darkrezet

Is it safe to buy advertising on the channel in terms of fraud?

Yes, the deterministic check showed a minimal risk score of 3 out of 100, and reactions along with an even distribution of views correspond to the natural behavior of real users.

What real reach will an advertising post get?

Median views are 67 per publication with a base of 107 subscribers, meaning the ad will be seen by a small but engaged group of people.

Is it justified to place ads on this channel?

Placement is considered justified due to the lack of bot activity and open comments; however, due to the small size of the channel, the impact will only make sense for narrow niche projects.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 39 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @darkrezet assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 39 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 107 subscribers, median post views were 67, ERR was 62.6%, and the cleanliness index was 97/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.