TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @VoidAccs

@VoidAccs: statistics and cleanliness index

Void Channel

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-09
Subscribers
18
Median views
95
ERR
527.8%
Posts sampled
16
Niche Other

Data from 2026-09-09 — 29 days old.

Assessment summary

With a micro-base of 18 subscribers and a median of 95 views, reach is driven by one-off external visits rather than regular readers.

The channel has been inactive for more than three weeks, and about 35% of the messages have been deleted, which leaves buying ads here virtually devoid of reach potential.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Channel content

🚩 Possible scam or deception signals

The feed contains suspicious offers to sell third-party sessions and a username via direct messages with payment in Stars and no guarantees.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 16 posts with views, from Jun 20 to Aug 16. The dashed line is the median (95).

059119Jun 20: 119 viewsJun 20: 104 viewsJun 20: 105 viewsJun 20: 100 viewsJun 20: 93 viewsJun 20: 96 viewsJun 20: 96 viewsJun 20: 96 viewsJun 20: 95 viewsJun 20: 95 viewsJun 21: 87 viewsJul 2: 56 viewsJul 2: 56 viewsAug 16: 8 viewsAug 16: 8 viewsAug 16: 8 views Jun 20Aug 16
  • post views
  • median 95

Maximum: 119 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 16: index 98, grade A+Jun 16Sep 9: index 100, grade A+Sep 9

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 16.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @VoidAccs

What level of manipulation risk did the analysis show?

The channel received a minimal risk score of 0 out of 100, as no direct manipulation anomalies were detected. However, check confidence is low due to the extremely small sample size and having only 18 subscribers.

Why does ERR exceed 500%?

The median view count is 95 with 18 subscribers, reflecting isolated external link visits rather than systematic interest from a regular audience.

Is buying ads on this channel justified?

Placement is considered questionable due to prolonged inactivity: the channel has not published new content for more than 23 days.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 16 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @VoidAccs assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 16 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 18 subscribers, median post views were 95, ERR was 527.8%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.