TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @giftsotkenta

Fake engagement check for @giftsotkenta

тюльпан дарит🌷 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-07-15.

по сотрудничеству/встать на менеджера: @tyulpan_one (менеджеры @tyulpanmanagers ) Чат: https://t.me/+Ir8StnhFjokyZmMy

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
11052
Median views
1985
ERR
18.0%
Posts sampled
26
Niche
Entertainment

Evidence snapshot

The @giftsotkenta assessment dated 2026-07-15 uses 26 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 11,052 subscribers, median post views were 1,985, ERR was 18.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 774–1,547 views.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

Run a fresh check for @giftsotkenta

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-07-15. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @giftsotkenta

Questions about @giftsotkenta

What does grade D mean for @giftsotkenta?

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What is the ERR of @giftsotkenta?

ERR is 18.0%. Median post views equal 18.0% of the channel's 11,052 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 50/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @giftsotkenta