TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @Aesthetic_Room58

@Aesthetic_Room58: statistics and cleanliness index

🔥Aesthetics_Room🔥

🔥 Aesthetics_Room 🔥 - канал посвященный женской эстетике тела 😍 Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/Aesthetic_Room58

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
4,644
Median views
1,560
ERR
33.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Beauty

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

An abnormally low view variance (CV 0.08) with comments disabled suggests the likelihood of partial background boosting to maintain a stable reach threshold.

In addition, about 38% of publications are deleted, indicating regular cleanup of temporary ad integrations — when placing ads, it is important to consider that the post is unlikely to remain in the feed permanently.

What to pay attention to

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.08)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 5 Beauty catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 214 to 561,979 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 4 of 5
@Aesthetic_Room58 33.6%
similar channels median 23.3%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 3 of 5
@Aesthetic_Room58 0.51
similar channels median 0.9

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 2 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (1,560).

08241.6KSep 2: 1,545 viewsSep 2: 1,610 viewsSep 2: 1,580 viewsSep 2: 1,620 viewsSep 3: 1,606 viewsSep 3: 1,569 viewsSep 3: 1,648 viewsSep 3: 1,551 viewsSep 4: 1,637 viewsSep 4: 1,634 viewsSep 4: 1,577 viewsSep 4: 1,528 viewsSep 5: 1,586 viewsSep 5: 1,588 viewsSep 5: 1,639 viewsSep 5: 1,562 viewsSep 6: 1,508 viewsSep 6: 1,559 viewsSep 6: 1,532 viewsSep 6: 1,570 viewsSep 6: 1,523 viewsSep 6: 1,491 viewsSep 7: 1,467 viewsSep 7: 1,479 viewsSep 7: 1,525 viewsSep 7: 1,580 viewsSep 7: 1,581 viewsSep 7: 1,583 viewsSep 7: 1,588 viewsSep 7: 1,588 viewsSep 7: 1,587 viewsSep 7: 1,503 viewsSep 7: 1,490 viewsSep 7: 1,385 viewsSep 7: 1,365 viewsSep 8: 1,271 viewsSep 8: 1,246 viewsSep 8: 1,230 viewsSep 8: 1,288 viewsSep 8: 1,236 views Sep 2Sep 8
  • post views
  • 8 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,560

Maximum: 1,648 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.08)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 17: index 70, grade BJun 17Sep 8: index 70, grade BSep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 1,365–1,580 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 8 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @Aesthetic_Room58

What is the channel's risk of artificial boosting?

The channel has a risk score of 30 out of 100 (green zone), which indicates a moderate risk, although unnaturally even views require attention.

What real reach can be expected?

The median reach is around 1,560 views per post (ERR about 33.6%), which, with a frequency of 6.5 posts per day, are gained primarily in the first hours after publication.

Is advertising placement justified?

Placement is considered justified, but due to the high share of deleted posts (38%), it is critical to agree in advance on the duration of the creative staying at the top and in the feed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Aesthetic_Room58 assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 4,644 subscribers, median post views were 1,560, ERR was 33.6%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.