TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @tnmnv

@tnmnv: statistics and cleanliness index

Ты никогда меня не видел

Время летит быстрее, чем мы думаем, и порой кажется, будто оно вовсе не подвластно нам.

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-01
Subscribers
1,344
Median views
768
ERR
57.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Celebrities & lifestyle
Post language Russian
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-10-01 — 7 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel publishes user-submitted photo stories in a "then and now" format, where subscribers showcase how they have changed over the years.

Posts are published rarely — about once every five days, and the ERR of 57.1% is significantly higher than the median of similar catalog channels (14.8%). With such infrequent posting, publications don't get lost in the feed and receive concentrated audience attention.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈42% of message IDs are missing

There are many gaps in the numbering of the channel's recent messages — some of them have been deleted. Message IDs are counted rather than publications: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones offer only a partial view of the channel.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Celebrities & lifestyle catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 619 to 3,113 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 5 of 6
@tnmnv 57.1%
similar channels median 14.8%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 4 of 6
@tnmnv 4.54
similar channels median 8.89

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Feb 27 to Sep 30. The dashed line is the median (768).

05791.2KFeb 27: 861 viewsMar 1: 830 viewsMar 3: 765 viewsMar 4: 766 viewsMar 4: 821 viewsMar 5: 880 viewsMar 6: 1,081 viewsMar 9: 1,075 viewsMar 16: 910 viewsMar 19: 964 viewsMar 21: 961 viewsMar 22: 1,079 viewsApr 1: 1,038 viewsApr 7: 973 viewsApr 9: 1,159 viewsApr 29: 961 viewsMay 16: 802 viewsMay 28: 752 viewsJun 3: 947 viewsJun 4: 946 viewsJun 10: 1,131 viewsJul 8: 790 viewsJul 22: 771 viewsJul 31: 611 viewsAug 5: 531 viewsAug 6: 708 viewsAug 25: 476 viewsAug 30: 455 viewsSep 3: 339 viewsSep 4: 341 viewsSep 5: 378 viewsSep 8: 351 viewsSep 10: 396 viewsSep 17: 302 viewsSep 20: 245 viewsSep 22: 229 viewsSep 25: 173 viewsSep 27: 136 viewsSep 28: 110 viewsSep 30: 55 views Feb 27Sep 30
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 768

Maximum: 1,159 views. Data as of Oct 1.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 12: index 92, grade A+Jun 12Sep 9: index 50, grade DSep 9Oct 1: index 89, grade AOct 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 137–274 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 1 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @tnmnv

What are the audit results for the channel @tnmnv?

The channel's Integrity Index is 89 out of 100 (grade A, "metrics normal" level). The view variance is natural (0.48), but around 42% of message IDs are missing among recent messages due to the deletion of some entries.

What reach does a publication get?

The median views are 768, corresponding to an ERR of about 57.1%. This is noticeably higher than the median value among similar catalog channels (14.8%).

Is advertising on the channel justified?

Advertising is justified: there is virtually no third-party advertising in the feed (around 2%), and infrequent posting allows the post to remain at the bottom of the feed for a long time.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @tnmnv assessment dated 2026-10-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,344 subscribers, median post views were 768, ERR was 57.1%, and the cleanliness index was 89/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.