Душевно приветсвуем Вас на Первом Православном канале Ссылка на канал: https://t.me/+vLEre0qTeSVjNDRi Реклама: @Reklama_Pravoslavie_bot
checked 2026-08-30
- Subscribers
- 184,124
- Median views
- 5,198
- ERR
- 2.8%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
A low risk score confirms the absence of artificial inflation: activity metrics are natural, and a high reaction rate (about 12% of views) points to an authentic core of readers. However, advertising here is questionable, as only about 5 thousand out of 184 thousand subscribers view posts, and frequent posting at 8 publications per day quickly pushes promotional messages out of view in the feed.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-30
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @religiya_molitva_pravoslavni assessment dated 2026-08-30 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 184,124 subscribers, median post views were 5,198, ERR was 2.8%, and the cleanliness index was 91/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: not recommended.
Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.
About 3,858–4,555 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
What to pay attention to
Low reach with authentic engagement
ERR is below normal, but reactions and comments are authentic — this is likely a dormant (accumulated) base rather than artificial inflation.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 25 to Aug 30. The dashed line is the median (5,198).
- post views
- 15 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 5,198
Maximum: 7,837 views. Data as of Aug 30.
What scoring found in the view pattern
Low reach with authentic engagement
ERR is below normal, but reactions and comments are authentic — this is likely a dormant (accumulated) base rather than artificial inflation.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-08-30 — 21 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @religiya_molitva_pravoslavni and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @religiya_molitva_pravoslavniQuestions about @religiya_molitva_pravoslavni
Are there any signs of artificial inflation on the channel?
A risk score of 9 out of 100 indicates an organic audience: open comments and a stable reaction rate are consistent with real users.
Why is advertising considered questionable?
The reason is low reach: posts are viewed by only a small portion of the base (median is around 5.2 thousand views with 184 thousand subscribers, ERR 2.82%).
How often are posts published and what happens to the feed?
The channel publishes an average of 8 posts per day, with about 33% of publications eventually being deleted, which is important to consider when negotiating placement duration.
Similar channels in Religion & Spirituality
- 100 · A+
- 50 · D
All channels in Religion & Spirituality
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.