TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @ezoterika_zapiski

@ezoterika_zapiski: statistics and cleanliness index

📜 Записки Эзотерика 🪬

🔮 Неизвестное и потайное во Вселенной ждет Вас 🪬 Реклама: @kam_rom Менеджеры: @kisulik31 , @vnsny, @yaroslava_mg ❗️Администрация не несёт ответственность за рекламу

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-04
Subscribers
40,220
Median views
1,820
ERR
4.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Esotericism, Astrology, Mysticism
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-10-04 — 5 days old.

Assessment summary

A niche channel with daily affirmations, tarot spreads, horoscopes, and folk incantations.

The main limitation of this platform is low audience interest: posts are viewed by less than 5% of subscribers, which is noticeably lower than similar verified channels in the directory, and over the past month and a half, the median view count has decreased.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Esotericism, Astrology, Mysticism catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 572 to 52,320 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 6 of 6
@ezoterika_zapiski 4.5%
similar channels median 12.9%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 4 of 6
@ezoterika_zapiski 2.93
similar channels median 15.19

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 27 to Oct 4. The dashed line is the median (1,820).

01.3K2.6KSep 27: 2,562 viewsSep 27: 2,424 viewsSep 27: 2,569 viewsSep 28: 1,988 viewsSep 28: 1,932 viewsSep 28: 1,811 viewsSep 28: 1,690 viewsSep 28: 1,565 viewsSep 28: 1,948 viewsSep 28: 2,070 viewsSep 28: 1,918 viewsSep 28: 2,026 viewsSep 29: 1,605 viewsSep 29: 1,658 viewsSep 29: 1,609 viewsSep 29: 1,569 viewsSep 29: 1,972 viewsSep 29: 1,830 viewsSep 29: 1,637 viewsSep 29: 1,740 viewsSep 30: 1,842 viewsSep 30: 1,751 viewsSep 30: 1,701 viewsSep 30: 2,066 viewsSep 30: 2,268 viewsSep 30: 2,271 viewsOct 1: 2,471 viewsOct 1: 2,380 viewsOct 2: 2,076 viewsOct 2: 1,886 viewsOct 2: 1,953 viewsOct 3: 1,373 viewsOct 3: 1,360 viewsOct 3: 1,196 viewsOct 3: 1,137 viewsOct 3: 1,101 viewsOct 3: 1,179 viewsOct 3: 1,086 viewsOct 4: 441 viewsOct 4: 310 views Sep 27Oct 4
  • post views
  • 8 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,820

Maximum: 2,569 views. Data as of Oct 4.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 15: index 45, grade DAug 15Oct 4: index 87, grade AOct 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 1,042–1,261 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 1,886 views versus 1,972 for regular posts — 4% lower.

Based on 13 advertising and 17 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 14 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @ezoterika_zapiski

Are there any anomalies in the channel's metrics?

The channel's Integrity Index is 87 out of 100 with an A grade and a "metrics are normal" level. No anomaly signals were detected during the analysis.

What portion of the audience do posts reach?

The median view count remains at around 1,820 per post, corresponding to an ERR of 4.5%. This is substantially lower than metrics of similar channels in the directory.

Is the channel suitable for buying advertising?

The feasibility of ad placement is considered questionable. The reason is low audience engagement, which results in posts being seen by only a small fraction of the subscriber base.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-04
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @ezoterika_zapiski assessment dated 2026-10-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 40,220 subscribers, median post views were 1,820, ERR was 4.5%, and the cleanliness index was 87/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.