TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @psy_b00k

@psy_b00k: statistics and cleanliness index

Библиотека психолога

окунись в мир Фрейда и Юнга! 📚 🤝 по поводу рекламы и сотрудничества обращаться к админу: t.me/psytg_admin или заказать: telega.in/c/psy_b00k ⚡резерв: max.ru/psy_b00k ⚡РКН: knd.gov.ru/license?id=676031506488485eace9c8b2&registryType=bloggersPermission

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-04
Subscribers
21,918
Median views
696
ERR
3.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Psychology & Relationships
Post language Russian
Channel age 6 years

Data from 2026-10-04 — 5 days old.

Assessment summary

A thematic channel featuring curated literature, professional materials, and psychology courses, running for more than six years.

Posts are read by a small portion of the audience: an ERR of 3.2% is lower than all five similar channels in the directory with a median of 20.8%, and about 43% of IDs are missing in the numbering due to deleted messages. Due to low subscriber engagement, the actual ad reach will be modest relative to the total number of subscribers.

What to pay attention to

Some messages deleted: ≈43% of IDs skipped

There are many gaps in the numbering of the channel's recent messages — some of them have been deleted. This counts message IDs rather than posts: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones provide only a partial picture of the channel.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 7 Psychology & Relationships catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 12,649 to 65,231 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 7 of 7
@psy_b00k 3.2%
similar channels median 20.8%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 10 to Oct 3. The dashed line is the median (696).

05231KSep 10: 823 viewsSep 10: 728 viewsSep 11: 731 viewsSep 11: 937 viewsSep 12: 832 viewsSep 13: 1,046 viewsSep 14: 970 viewsSep 14: 792 viewsSep 15: 833 viewsSep 16: 773 viewsSep 16: 802 viewsSep 17: 702 viewsSep 17: 814 viewsSep 18: 663 viewsSep 18: 750 viewsSep 19: 765 viewsSep 20: 703 viewsSep 21: 712 viewsSep 21: 724 viewsSep 22: 624 viewsSep 22: 867 viewsSep 23: 649 viewsSep 23: 664 viewsSep 24: 613 viewsSep 24: 671 viewsSep 25: 621 viewsSep 25: 672 viewsSep 26: 641 viewsSep 26: 682 viewsSep 27: 691 viewsSep 28: 843 viewsSep 28: 623 viewsSep 29: 577 viewsSep 29: 536 viewsSep 30: 570 viewsSep 30: 566 viewsOct 1: 500 viewsOct 2: 478 viewsOct 3: 406 viewsOct 3: 296 views Sep 10Oct 3
  • post views
  • 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 696

Maximum: 1,046 views. Data as of Oct 4.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 13: index 71, grade BJun 13Sep 6: index 50, grade DSep 6Oct 4: index 84, grade AOct 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 351–442 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 1 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @psy_b00k

What is the quality of the audience and metrics for @psy_b00k?

The channel received an integrity score of 84 out of 100 (grade A, 'metrics are normal' tier). The view distribution is natural; however, about 43% of message IDs in the feed are missing due to deletions.

What reach do the posts get?

The median view count is around 696 per post with 21.9k subscribers (ERR 3.2%). This is substantially lower than similar verified channels in the niche, where the median ERR reaches 20.8%.

Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?

The advisability of placing ads is considered debatable. The main reason is that posts are seen by only a small fraction of the channel's total subscriber base.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-04
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @psy_b00k assessment dated 2026-10-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 21,918 subscribers, median post views were 696, ERR was 3.2%, and the cleanliness index was 84/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.