TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @NiceJournal

@NiceJournal: statistics and cleanliness index

Добрые новости 📰

Пока другие пишут о проблемах и скандалах, мы доказываем, что в мире полно добра и позитива ☀️Канал на Telega.in: https://telega.in/c/NiceJourn 🫶Наша сеть: @UnitedChannelsNetwork 🤝Сотрудничаем с @TgPodbor_bot Регистрация в РКН — https://clck.ru/3Fn7jM

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-04
Subscribers
97,152
Median views
1,558
ERR
1.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche News and Media
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-10-04 — 5 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel publishes short positive notes and videos about good deeds, animals, and inspiring events.

Posts are read by a small fraction of the audience: an ERR of 1.6% is lower than that of all 22 similar channels in the catalog, and over the past three months, the median view count dropped from 6,153 to 1,558. Combined with roughly 49% of message IDs missing and comments turned off, ads will generate minimal response relative to the subscriber base of 97 thousand.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 1.6% with 97,152 subscribers

Views are noticeably lower than usual for channels of this size: only a small fraction of subscribers sees a post. This happens when the audience has lost interest or stopped reading the channel.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 23 News and Media catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 34,385 to 278,202 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 23 of 23
@NiceJournal 1.6%
similar channels median 12.4%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 14 of 20
@NiceJournal 2.04
similar channels median 1.41

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 26 to Oct 3. The dashed line is the median (1,558).

09551.9KAug 26: 1,779 viewsAug 27: 1,846 viewsAug 28: 1,911 viewsAug 29: 1,743 viewsAug 30: 1,720 viewsAug 31: 1,725 viewsSep 1: 1,798 viewsSep 2: 1,796 viewsSep 3: 1,690 viewsSep 4: 1,565 viewsSep 5: 1,700 viewsSep 6: 1,790 viewsSep 7: 1,649 viewsSep 8: 1,650 viewsSep 9: 1,676 viewsSep 10: 1,552 viewsSep 11: 1,482 viewsSep 12: 1,617 viewsSep 13: 1,671 viewsSep 15: 1,574 viewsSep 16: 1,610 viewsSep 17: 1,474 viewsSep 18: 1,534 viewsSep 19: 1,511 viewsSep 20: 1,519 viewsSep 21: 1,568 viewsSep 22: 1,438 viewsSep 23: 1,324 viewsSep 25: 1,091 viewsSep 26: 994 viewsSep 26: 1,156 viewsSep 27: 1,120 viewsSep 28: 1,120 viewsSep 29: 992 viewsSep 30: 876 viewsOct 1: 701 viewsOct 2: 576 viewsOct 2: 504 viewsOct 3: 375 viewsOct 3: 329 views Aug 26Oct 3
  • post views
  • 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,558

Maximum: 1,911 views. Data as of Oct 4.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 1.6% with 97,152 subscribers

Views are noticeably lower than usual for channels of this size: only a small fraction of subscribers sees a post. This happens when the audience has lost interest or stopped reading the channel.

Cleanliness-index history

4 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 24: index 50, grade DJun 24Aug 19: index 50, grade DAug 19Sep 21: index 50, grade DSep 21Oct 4: index 50, grade DOct 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 553–1,106 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 2 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @NiceJournal

Is the @NiceJournal channel suitable for buying ads?

Placing ads here is considered questionable. The cleanliness index is 50 out of 100 (grade D, "anomalies present" level), and posts are seen by only a small fraction of the total subscriber count.

What is the real reach of publications in the channel?

Median views stand at 1,558 per post, resulting in an ERR of about 1.6%. This is lower than the figures of all 22 verified channels in this niche in the catalog, with the metric dropping nearly fourfold over the past 100 days.

What peculiarities were detected in the channel's metrics?

The analysis revealed a significant drop in audience activity and deleted messages: about 49% of post IDs are missing in the analyzed sample, and comments under posts are disabled.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-04
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @NiceJournal assessment dated 2026-10-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 97,152 subscribers, median post views were 1,558, ERR was 1.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.