TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @arbuzno

Fake engagement check for @arbuzno

Арбузные корки — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-09.

— Эй, Брэйн, чем мы будем заниматься сегодня вечером? — Тем же, чем и всегда, Пинки… Попробуем завоевать мир. 🍉

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-09
Subscribers
40
Median views
121
ERR
302.5%
Posts sampled
35
Niche Blogs

Assessment summary

The low risk is due to the absence of signs of artificial boosting; however, reach metrics are calculated from a microscopic base of 40 subscribers, where views exceeding the audience are typical for forwards and external reading. The main obstacle for an advertiser is the extremely infrequent posting (about 0.1 posts per day) and a median of only 121 views, meaning a commercial placement will not deliver meaningful reach.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 14 to 74 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 6 of 9
302.5% for @arbuzno similar channels median: 397.4%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 5 of 9
6.28 for @arbuzno similar channels median: 3.14

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 35 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @arbuzno assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 35 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 40 subscribers, median post views were 121, ERR was 302.5%, and the cleanliness index was 96/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts come out rarely, so an ad will struggle to get views.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 35 posts with views, from Dec 25 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (121).

08641.7KDec 25: 62 viewsDec 25: 69 viewsDec 25: 1,729 viewsDec 25: 101 viewsDec 25: 95 viewsDec 27: 99 viewsJan 6: 140 viewsJan 7: 147 viewsJan 7: 129 viewsJan 25: 122 viewsJan 25: 135 viewsFeb 4: 105 viewsFeb 11: 71 viewsFeb 12: 74 viewsFeb 14: 77 viewsFeb 14: 86 viewsFeb 18: 98 viewsMar 3: 73 viewsMar 3: 106 viewsMar 19: 121 viewsMar 22: 156 viewsJul 28: 80 viewsAug 1: 81 viewsSep 5: 25 viewsSep 8: 11 viewsSep 8: 208 viewsSep 8: 220 viewsSep 8: 227 viewsSep 8: 207 viewsSep 8: 212 viewsSep 8: 207 viewsSep 8: 206 viewsSep 8: 201 viewsSep 8: 199 viewsSep 8: 188 views Dec 25Sep 8

Maximum: 1,729 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@arbuzno forwards posts from

@arbuzno's posts are forwarded by

Only among channels we have checked.

Map of all links between checked channels

Check today: @arbuzno

Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @arbuzno and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @arbuzno

Questions about @arbuzno

Is the channel safe in terms of artificial boosting?

The deterministic check showed minimal risk (4 out of 100) and no signs of bots; however, the analysis confidence is low due to the small base of 40 subscribers.

Why is the feasibility of placing ads marked as questionable?

The reason is the author's low activity: posts are published on average once every 10 days (0.1 posts per day), making it difficult to forecast advertising performance.

What reach will an advertising post get on this channel?

The median reach of posts is 121 views, while there is insufficient data on dedicated advertising reach due to infrequent commercial integrations.

Similar channels in Blogs

All channels in Blogs

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @arbuzno