TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @mfapple

@mfapple: statistics and cleanliness index

Новая продукция Apple, Android. 📍Брянск По заказу/вопросам заказа - @manager_mfapple

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-11
Subscribers
110
Median views
191
ERR
173.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science

Data from 2026-09-11 — 27 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel serves as a storefront for a local electronics store in Bryansk, where views exceed the subscriber count due to direct links and forwards of products to customers.

While the risk of fraud is zero, buying ads remains questionable due to inactivity: the feed has not been updated for almost a month, and a new post risks going unnoticed.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 68 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 10 to 4,404,048 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 68 of 68
@mfapple 173.6%
similar channels median 11.4%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 62 of 63
@mfapple 5.67
similar channels median 0.47

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 9 to Aug 15. The dashed line is the median (191).

0126252Jul 9: 144 viewsJul 9: 147 viewsJul 9: 150 viewsJul 9: 139 viewsJul 10: 229 viewsJul 10: 230 viewsJul 10: 230 viewsJul 10: 250 viewsJul 10: 252 viewsJul 10: 249 viewsJul 10: 233 viewsJul 10: 232 viewsJul 10: 233 viewsJul 20: 226 viewsJul 20: 229 viewsJul 26: 191 viewsJul 26: 191 viewsJul 26: 183 viewsJul 26: 185 viewsJul 26: 181 viewsJul 26: 182 viewsJul 26: 185 viewsJul 26: 193 viewsJul 26: 199 viewsJul 31: 192 viewsJul 31: 199 viewsJul 31: 200 viewsJul 31: 196 viewsJul 31: 194 viewsJul 31: 198 viewsJul 31: 188 viewsJul 31: 193 viewsJul 31: 187 viewsAug 7: 141 viewsAug 7: 80 viewsAug 7: 166 viewsAug 13: 185 viewsAug 13: 190 viewsAug 13: 174 viewsAug 15: 74 views Jul 9Aug 15
  • post views
  • median 191

Maximum: 252 views. Data as of Sep 11.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

4 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 23: index 100, grade A+Jun 23Jul 17: index 100, grade A+Jul 17Aug 11: index 100, grade A+Aug 11Sep 11: index 100, grade A+Sep 11

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @mfapple

Are there any signs of inflated metrics on the channel?

No, the risk score is 0 out of 100, and bot boosting has not been detected. However, the assessment has low confidence due to the microscopic base size of 110 subscribers.

Why are there more views than subscribers?

The median is 191 views per post with 110 readers. For a product catalog, it is normal when product cards are shared in direct messages or linked from external classified boards.

Does it make sense to buy ads here?

Placement is questionable. The main issue is the lack of activity: the last post was published 26 days ago, so the audience might not notice a new post.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-11
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @mfapple assessment dated 2026-09-11 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 110 subscribers, median post views were 191, ERR was 173.6%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.