TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @omsk_kingstore

Fake engagement check for @omsk_kingstore

KINGSTORE | Ваш Apple-гид в Омске🍏 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-21.

💬Мы – команда фанатов Apple 💻Оригинальная техника В НАЛИЧИИ! 💸Выгодный Трейд-ин Заходите в гости: 🧑‍💻Ежедневно с 10:00 до 21:00 📍ТЦ «Фестиваль» | +79088089000 📍ТК «Терминал» | +79507908000 📍ТЦ «Триумф» | +79026754351

Grade B low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-21
Subscribers
5,333
Median views
402
ERR
7.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Assessment summary

Low variance in views (CV 0.10) and uniform reaction patterns suggest background automated activity boosting; however, the median of 402 views appears plausible for a niche community. The channel's main constraint is its strict geographic focus on Omsk and gadget sales: advertising will only be effective for local businesses or similar consumer electronics.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 15 checked Computer science channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 1,815 to 15,150 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 14 of 15
7.5% for @omsk_kingstore similar channels median: 12.6%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 11 of 14
1.69 for @omsk_kingstore similar channels median: 0.48

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-21
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @omsk_kingstore assessment dated 2026-09-21 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 5,333 subscribers, median post views were 402, ERR was 7.5%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 407–440 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 1 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

What grade B means

Mostly clean with a couple of weak signals. Check again before a big ad purchase.

What to pay attention to

Views do not mature (old ≈ fresh, ×1.10)

In an authentic channel, older posts gain 1.5–3 times more views than 24-hour-old ones. Here, older posts have gathered roughly the same amount — a typical sign of one-time view inflation right after publication. Caveat: there are only 2 daily posts in the sample, which is not enough to firmly judge the channel, so the observation is considered weak.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 10 to Sep 20. The dashed line is the median (402).

0265530Sep 10: 377 viewsSep 10: 406 viewsSep 10: 400 viewsSep 10: 471 viewsSep 10: 481 viewsSep 10: 462 viewsSep 10: 444 viewsSep 10: 436 viewsSep 10: 530 viewsSep 11: 442 viewsSep 11: 474 viewsSep 12: 484 viewsSep 14: 419 viewsSep 14: 454 viewsSep 15: 387 viewsSep 15: 403 viewsSep 15: 509 viewsSep 15: 419 viewsSep 15: 399 viewsSep 15: 390 viewsSep 15: 394 viewsSep 15: 398 viewsSep 16: 354 viewsSep 16: 379 viewsSep 16: 433 viewsSep 16: 413 viewsSep 16: 349 viewsSep 16: 385 viewsSep 17: 364 viewsSep 17: 392 viewsSep 17: 418 viewsSep 18: 401 viewsSep 18: 400 viewsSep 19: 393 viewsSep 19: 393 viewsSep 19: 394 viewsSep 19: 396 viewsSep 19: 434 viewsSep 20: 380 viewsSep 20: 447 views Sep 10Sep 20

Maximum: 530 views. Data as of Sep 21.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views do not mature (old ≈ fresh, ×1.10)

In an authentic channel, older posts gain 1.5–3 times more views than 24-hour-old ones. Here, older posts have gathered roughly the same amount — a typical sign of one-time view inflation right after publication. Caveat: there are only 2 daily posts in the sample, which is not enough to firmly judge the channel, so the observation is considered weak.

Suspiciously consistent views (CV ≈ 0.10)

The variance in views between posts is noticeably lower than normal for an authentic channel (typically 0.15–0.6). Partial inflation is possible.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Run a fresh check for @omsk_kingstore

Data from 2026-09-21 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @omsk_kingstore and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @omsk_kingstore

Questions about @omsk_kingstore

Are there signs of boosting on the channel?

The risk is assessed as low (30 out of 100), but suspiciously consistent post views and uniform reactions were detected.

How many people will see an ad post?

On average, a post gets about 400 views (ERR 7.54%), with the feed being updated approximately 4 times a day.

Is it worth advertising in this channel?

Placement is justified if your product is targeted at Omsk residents or mobile electronics buyers.

Similar channels in Computer science

All channels in Computer science

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @omsk_kingstore