TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @lihmer20

Fake engagement check for @lihmer20

Миллионы на ремонтах с LR 2.0 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-05.

Франшиза №1 в нише ремонтов https://lihmer-franchise.ru/ 🔸25 партнёров в России 🔸Лучший партнер зарабатывает 2-3🍋 в месяц на ремонтах 🔸Сняли фильм о компании https://youtu.be/On_e3nYkSOs max-sgay

84/100
cleanliness index
Grade A
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
449
Median views
197
ERR
43.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Business

Evidence snapshot

The @lihmer20 assessment dated 2026-08-05 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 449 subscribers, median post views were 197, ERR was 43.9%, and the cleanliness index was 84/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

There are not enough posts for a reach forecast.

What grade A means

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

Run a fresh check for @lihmer20

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-05. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @lihmer20

Questions about @lihmer20

What does grade A mean for @lihmer20?

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

What is the ERR of @lihmer20?

ERR is 43.9%. Median post views equal 43.9% of the channel's 449 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 84/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @lihmer20