Поставил маркетинг на службу тату-мастерам Учу делать стабильную запись и растить бренд
checked 2026-08-29
- Subscribers
- 4,157
- Median views
- 792
- ERR
- 19.1%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
An author-led blog with minimal ad load (2%) and a low posting pace (less than one post per day), allowing promotional posts to retain attention for a long time without being pushed down the feed. The channel's audience is engaged with the author's personal content, making ad placements reasonable and effective primarily for products and services targeting tattoo artists and service professionals.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 5 checked Marketing & PR channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 1,528 to 11,678 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-29
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @alexzemirov assessment dated 2026-08-29 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 4,157 subscribers, median post views were 792, ERR was 19.1%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
About 397–424 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
What to pay attention to
Third-party spam in comments (not owner boosting)
The comments look like spam mailings and self-promotion from third-party accounts, rather than artificial discussion boosting by the channel owner. This does not affect the risk of manipulation — the owner just needs to enable moderation/anti-spam in the comments chat.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 15 to Aug 28. The dashed line is the median (792).
- post views
- 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 792
Maximum: 1,101 views. Data as of Aug 29.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-08-29 — 22 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @alexzemirov and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @alexzemirovQuestions about @alexzemirov
Is it safe to advertise on this channel?
Yes, the audit showed a zero risk of manipulation (0/100) with high algorithm confidence, and the distribution of views and reactions corresponds to an authentic audience.
What reach can be expected when posting?
The median post reach is about 792 views (ERR around 19%), while infrequent posting ensures the post stays in view for a long time.
Is buying ads on this channel worth it?
The placement is justified: the channel is run in the first person with open comments, and third-party ads account for only 2%, which increases the value of each placement.
Similar channels in Marketing & PR
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
- 98 · A+
- 94 · A+
- 81 · A
All channels in Marketing & PR
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.