TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @isabelleauthor

Fake engagement check for @isabelleauthor

Иса Белль | АВТОР и ПРИЗРАК СВЕТА — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-04.

автор ЭКСМО и ЛитРес да, это я написала #наследиепяти мои соц. сети и книги — https://taplink.cc/isabelleauthor для связи: личные сообщения канала

82/100
cleanliness index
Grade A
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
15412
Median views
15039
ERR
97.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Other

Evidence snapshot

The @isabelleauthor assessment dated 2026-08-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 15,412 subscribers, median post views were 15,039, ERR was 97.6%, and the cleanliness index was 82/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 9,794–14,578 views.

What grade A means

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

Run a fresh check for @isabelleauthor

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-04. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @isabelleauthor

Questions about @isabelleauthor

What does grade A mean for @isabelleauthor?

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

What is the ERR of @isabelleauthor?

ERR is 97.6%. Median post views equal 97.6% of the channel's 15,412 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 82/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @isabelleauthor