аня 21, обрести покой в книгах я - @dmnaaaaa мой магазин свечей: https://t.me/sacralnonuk реклама, сотрудничество: https://t.me/prbooksnuk
checked 2026-09-09
- Subscribers
- 2,324
- Median views
- 552
- ERR
- 23.8%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
The channel demonstrates the pattern of an organic personal microblog: posts consistently gather around 550 views with a high reaction rate (12.7% of views) and natural metric variance. A low posting frequency (less than two posts per day) ensures that an ad will stay at the top of the feed for a long time; however, advertisers should consider the share of deleted posts (29%) and the irregular update schedule.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 9 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 1,106 to 6,456 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-09
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @booksnuk assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,324 subscribers, median post views were 552, ERR was 23.8%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
About 330–563 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 15 to Sep 6. The dashed line is the median (552).
- post views
- median 552
Maximum: 803 views. Data as of Sep 9.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Forwarding links
@booksnuk forwards posts from
- @sacralnonuk check in the botcheck
@booksnuk's posts are forwarded by
Only among channels we have checked.
Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @booksnuk and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @booksnukQuestions about @booksnuk
Are there any signs of audience inflation on the channel?
No, the risk score is 1/100. Engagement (ERR around 24%) and high reaction feedback indicate a genuine, personal audience.
How many views does a post get on average?
The median reach is around 552 views per post with a total base of 2,324 subscribers.
Is buying ads on this platform justified?
Yes, placement is considered justified: there are no ads in the feed, posts are published rarely and are not pushed down by new content, ensuring audience attention.
Similar channels in Blogs
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.