TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @booksnuk

Fake engagement check for @booksnuk

с любовью, нюк — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-09.

аня 21, обрести покой в книгах я - @dmnaaaaa мой магазин свечей: https://t.me/sacralnonuk реклама, сотрудничество: https://t.me/prbooksnuk

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-09
Subscribers
2,324
Median views
552
ERR
23.8%
Posts sampled
40

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates the pattern of an organic personal microblog: posts consistently gather around 550 views with a high reaction rate (12.7% of views) and natural metric variance. A low posting frequency (less than two posts per day) ensures that an ad will stay at the top of the feed for a long time; however, advertisers should consider the share of deleted posts (29%) and the irregular update schedule.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 1,106 to 6,456 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 5 of 9
23.8% for @booksnuk similar channels median: 22%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 7 of 9
12.67 for @booksnuk similar channels median: 2.5

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @booksnuk assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,324 subscribers, median post views were 552, ERR was 23.8%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 330–563 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 15 to Sep 6. The dashed line is the median (552).

0401803Aug 15: 603 viewsAug 15: 625 viewsAug 15: 589 viewsAug 15: 594 viewsAug 17: 659 viewsAug 20: 545 viewsAug 21: 571 viewsAug 21: 559 viewsAug 21: 500 viewsAug 21: 501 viewsAug 21: 502 viewsAug 21: 582 viewsAug 22: 609 viewsAug 22: 803 viewsAug 22: 762 viewsAug 22: 733 viewsAug 22: 716 viewsAug 22: 680 viewsAug 22: 671 viewsAug 22: 673 viewsAug 22: 792 viewsAug 22: 803 viewsAug 26: 620 viewsAug 26: 706 viewsSep 3: 422 viewsSep 3: 423 viewsSep 3: 403 viewsSep 3: 398 viewsSep 3: 398 viewsSep 3: 405 viewsSep 4: 340 viewsSep 4: 342 viewsSep 4: 348 viewsSep 4: 360 viewsSep 4: 352 viewsSep 6: 309 viewsSep 6: 307 viewsSep 6: 307 viewsSep 6: 310 viewsSep 6: 310 views Aug 15Sep 6

Maximum: 803 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@booksnuk forwards posts from

@booksnuk's posts are forwarded by

Only among channels we have checked.

Check today: @booksnuk

Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @booksnuk and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @booksnuk

Questions about @booksnuk

Are there any signs of audience inflation on the channel?

No, the risk score is 1/100. Engagement (ERR around 24%) and high reaction feedback indicate a genuine, personal audience.

How many views does a post get on average?

The median reach is around 552 views per post with a total base of 2,324 subscribers.

Is buying ads on this platform justified?

Yes, placement is considered justified: there are no ads in the feed, posts are published rarely and are not pushed down by new content, ensuring audience attention.

Similar channels in Blogs

All channels in Blogs

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @booksnuk