Связь и сотрудничество пишите @Anastasiaakter Обожаю всё мистическое и мир фентези. Книги - моя жизнь! Косплеи - моё хобби🙏 Танцы 💃 Актриса театра.Волонтёр🙏 Блогер 🙏 Живу на 6 платформах ❤️ Люблю жизнь🔥
checked 2026-09-08
- Subscribers
- 12,663
- Median views
- 201
- ERR
- 1.6%
- Posts sampled
- 38
Assessment summary
The low risk score is confirmed by organic audience behavior: comments are open, and the ratio of reactions to views is very high, which is typical for a personal creator's blog. However, the subscriber base is mostly inactive — the median reach is only around 200 views, meaning an advertiser risks overpaying for nominal audience numbers. The situation is further aggravated by a high posting frequency (almost 13 posts per day), causing an ad post to very quickly disappear from readers' sight.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-08
- Sample
- The latest 38 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @nasteihenmirfentezy assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 12,663 subscribers, median post views were 201, ERR was 1.6%, and the cleanliness index was 88/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: not recommended.
Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.
About 113–247 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 38.
What grade A means
Looks clean: metrics are normal, no manipulation visible.
What to pay attention to
Low reach with genuine engagement
ERR is below normal, but reactions and comments are genuine — this is likely an accumulated dormant base rather than fake engagement.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 38 posts with views, from Sep 5 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (201).
- post views
- 20 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 201
Maximum: 313 views. Data as of Sep 8.
What scoring found in the view pattern
Low reach with genuine engagement
ERR is below normal, but reactions and comments are genuine — this is likely an accumulated dormant base rather than fake engagement.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Forwarding links
@nasteihenmirfentezy forwards posts from
@alyonaisreading
- @printz_lda_i_krovi check in the botcheck
Data from 2026-09-08 — 12 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @nasteihenmirfentezy and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @nasteihenmirfentezyQuestions about @nasteihenmirfentezy
Are there signs of fake engagement on the channel?
The channel has a low risk score (12 out of 100). Reactions, open comments, and a natural variance in views indicate a real, engaged audience with no signs of bot activity.
Why is ad placement rated as questionable?
The reason is weak reach: only a small fraction of subscribers views the posts (ERR is around 1.59%, with a median of 201 views across 12.6k readers).
How many views will an ad post receive?
You should expect around the median 200 views. With a posting frequency of about 13 posts per day, an ad post will quickly get pushed down the feed.
Similar channels in Books, Audiobooks & Podcasts
- 87 · A
- 87 · A
- 55 · C
All channels in Books, Audiobooks & Podcasts
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.