TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @GlushBCE

@GlushBCE: statistics and cleanliness index

обходы глушилок || впн

никого не к чему не принуждаем и ничего не пропагандируем ничего не рекламируем, канал создан и ведется в информационно-ознакомительных целях

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-06
Subscribers
1,807
Median views
5,205
ERR
288%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science
Post language Russian
Channel age 9 months

Data from 2026-10-06 — 3 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is a list of links to third-party VPN services and bots indicating free access periods. Post views are nearly triple the subscriber count: the ERR rate is 288%, which is higher than all 14 similar channels in the catalog.

With closed comments and posts published once every three days, predicting the reach of an ad post is difficult due to metric anomalies.

What to pay attention to

More views than subscribers: ERR ≈ 288%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count across half of the posts, not just on a single viral one. This happens when posts spread outside the channel via forwards, chats, or external traffic, but other metrics do not support this version.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 1,655 to 5,333 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 14 of 14
@GlushBCE 288%
similar channels median 27.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 12 of 13
@GlushBCE 0.37
similar channels median 0.96

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from May 3 to Sep 30. The dashed line is the median (5,205).

04.4K8.9KMay 3: 7,977 viewsMay 4: 8,165 viewsMay 5: 8,772 viewsMay 10: 8,547 viewsMay 10: 8,851 viewsMay 12: 8,711 viewsMay 16: 8,541 viewsMay 24: 8,075 viewsMay 29: 7,734 viewsJun 5: 7,227 viewsJun 5: 7,417 viewsJun 14: 6,937 viewsJun 15: 7,100 viewsJul 10: 5,602 viewsJul 10: 5,835 viewsJul 18: 5,246 viewsJul 18: 5,390 viewsJul 20: 5,582 viewsJul 20: 5,837 viewsAug 6: 4,638 viewsAug 8: 4,703 viewsAug 9: 4,916 viewsAug 12: 4,761 viewsAug 13: 4,742 viewsAug 13: 4,886 viewsAug 13: 5,036 viewsAug 15: 5,099 viewsAug 18: 4,975 viewsAug 19: 5,165 viewsAug 19: 5,376 viewsAug 27: 4,824 viewsAug 31: 4,453 viewsAug 31: 4,625 viewsSep 1: 4,651 viewsSep 11: 3,674 viewsSep 19: 2,856 viewsSep 23: 2,302 viewsSep 27: 1,507 viewsSep 30: 939 viewsSep 30: 915 views May 3Sep 30
  • post views
  • median 5,205

Maximum: 8,851 views. Data as of Oct 6.

What scoring found in the view pattern

More views than subscribers: ERR ≈ 288%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count across half of the posts, not just on a single viral one. This happens when posts spread outside the channel via forwards, chats, or external traffic, but other metrics do not support this version.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 4: index 50, grade DAug 4Sep 9: index 50, grade DSep 9Oct 6: index 50, grade DOct 6

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

About 793–1,450 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @GlushBCE

What is the purity index of channel @GlushBCE?

The channel's purity index is 50 out of 100 (grade D, 'has anomalies' level). The main reason for the lower index is an abnormally high ERR reach of 288%, where views significantly exceed the subscriber base.

Is it worth placing ads on this channel?

The feasibility of placement is considered questionable. Due to anomalies in reach and engagement metrics, it is difficult to determine in advance how many real users will see the post.

What is the audience engagement on posts?

Reactions are left by about 0.37% of viewers, which is below the median of similar channels in the catalog (0.96%). The ability to leave comments on posts is disabled, and new posts are published on average once every three days.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-06
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @GlushBCE assessment dated 2026-10-06 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,807 subscribers, median post views were 5,205, ERR was 288.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.