Муддатли туловга 0% Кулай шартларда! 🙏 Доставка албатта бепул😊 +996 417 655 155 📍Адрес : Бешкек Цум 0-этаж отдел G-17 Рахман 🇰🇬🤝🇺🇿 ✅OTZIV - ISBOTLAR 👇 @apple_nasiya_otziv
checked 2026-08-31
- Subscribers
- 100,983
- Median views
- 4,945
- ERR
- 4.9%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
With an audience of over 100,000 subscribers, publications gather fewer than 5,000 views, indicating a low share of active readers in the total base. The artificial uniformity of reactions (CV 0.02) indicates likely engagement boosting on posts. In addition, with an intensity of about 20 publications per day, an advertisement will quickly get lost in the dense stream of product cards.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 18 checked Computer science channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 36,964 to 294,734 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-31
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @apple_nasiya_market assessment dated 2026-08-31 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 100,983 subscribers, median post views were 4,945, ERR was 4.9%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.
About 2,848–4,909 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade C means
Some metrics are worrying: views may be partly inflated or the audience passive. Be careful with ads.
What to pay attention to
Identical number of reactions across different posts (CV ≈ 0.02)
The number of reactions barely changes from post to post, which is a sign of artificial reaction boosting.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 28 to Aug 31. The dashed line is the median (4,945).
- post views
- 17 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 4,945
Maximum: 9,126 views. Data as of Aug 31.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-08-31 — 20 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @apple_nasiya_market and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @apple_nasiya_marketQuestions about @apple_nasiya_market
What risk level has been determined for this channel?
The channel received a risk score of 45 out of 100 (moderate risk), due to signs of artificial reaction boosting and weak subscriber engagement.
What is the actual reach of the posts?
The median reach is 4,945 views (ERR around 4.9%), meaning only a small fraction of the 100,000-strong audience views the posts.
Why is ad placement considered questionable?
Feasibility is questionable due to weak reach relative to the total base and a high publication frequency (around 19.5 posts per day), pushing the ad out of view.
Similar channels in Computer science
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
All channels in Computer science
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.