TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @Quvaliklarga

Fake engagement check for @Quvaliklarga

QUVALIKLAR КУВАЛИКЛАР QUVA yangiliklar — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-18.

📢 @Quvaliklarga 📰 Қувага оид энг сўнгги янгиликлар 🚨 Тезкор хабарлар 🎥 Эксклюзив фото ва видеолар Биз билан Қувадаги барча муҳим воқеалардан биринчи бўлиб хабардор бўлинг! 👉 Мурожаат: @Quva_menejer

Grade A low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-18
Subscribers
91,990
Median views
1,980
ERR
2.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche News and Media
Post language Belarusian 67% of posts
Channel age 1 year

Assessment summary

The channel has gathered almost 92 thousand subscribers, but posts are read by only about 1,980 people (ERR 2.15%), and the recent growth of 10 thousand readers was not reflected in views at all. The administrator directly admits in one of the posts that the subscriber base was inflated to push the channel to the top of Telegram search. At a pace of 14 posts per day, placing ads here is questionable: the ad will immediately sink down the feed and deliver the reach of just a small local blog of two thousand people.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 23 checked News and Media channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 30,882 to 270,428 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 22 of 23
2.2% for @Quvaliklarga similar channels median: 12.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 19 of 20
0.18 for @Quvaliklarga similar channels median: 1.4

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-18
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Quvaliklarga assessment dated 2026-09-18 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 91,990 subscribers, median post views were 1,980, ERR was 2.2%, and the cleanliness index was 87/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 1,117–2,100 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 5 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 4 posts.

What grade A means

Looks clean: metrics are normal, no manipulation visible.

What to pay attention to

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.2%

View engagement is below the norm for a channel of this size. This may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 15 to Sep 18. The dashed line is the median (1,980).

01.7K3.4KSep 15: 2,318 viewsSep 15: 2,392 viewsSep 15: 2,238 viewsSep 15: 2,253 viewsSep 15: 2,337 viewsSep 15: 2,451 viewsSep 15: 3,348 viewsSep 15: 3,402 viewsSep 15: 2,641 viewsSep 15: 2,332 viewsSep 16: 2,134 viewsSep 16: 2,100 viewsSep 16: 1,373 viewsSep 16: 2,516 viewsSep 16: 2,302 viewsSep 16: 2,305 viewsSep 16: 2,095 viewsSep 16: 1,117 viewsSep 16: 1,091 viewsSep 16: 2,378 viewsSep 16: 2,442 viewsSep 16: 2,808 viewsSep 16: 2,296 viewsSep 17: 1,780 viewsSep 17: 837 viewsSep 17: 1,630 viewsSep 17: 1,677 viewsSep 17: 1,702 viewsSep 17: 1,826 viewsSep 17: 1,784 viewsSep 17: 1,794 viewsSep 17: 1,830 viewsSep 17: 1,706 viewsSep 17: 1,865 viewsSep 17: 1,845 viewsSep 17: 1,113 viewsSep 17: 901 viewsSep 17: 1,105 viewsSep 18: 640 viewsSep 18: 175 views Sep 15Sep 18

Maximum: 3,402 views. Data as of Sep 18.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.2%

View engagement is below the norm for a channel of this size. This may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 1: index 55, grade CSep 1Sep 18: index 87, grade ASep 18

@Quvaliklarga forwards posts from

Check today: @Quvaliklarga

Data from 2026-09-18 — 2 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @Quvaliklarga and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @Quvaliklarga

Questions about @Quvaliklarga

Is it worth buying ads on this channel?

Placement here is considered questionable, despite the low fraud risk (score 13 out of 100). Real audience engagement is extremely low: posts are seen by only a couple of percent of the claimed base.

Why is post reach so low?

With 92 thousand subscribers, the median view count is only 1,980. The administrator openly stated in the feed that the subscriber count was artificially inflated for search rankings.

What effect will an ad post have?

An advertiser will get about 2,000 views, and due to a posting frequency of 14 posts per day, the post will quickly disappear from view. It makes sense to calculate the placement price based only on these actual figures, ignoring the total number of readers.

Similar channels in News and Media

All channels in News and Media

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @Quvaliklarga