TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @lexygpt

Fake engagement check for @lexygpt

Lexy | Промты • ИИ • Новости — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-14.

Создаю премиум-портреты из ваших фото. Как после съемки у топ-фотографа ✨ Попробуй: https://t.me/lexygpt_bot?start=NEWS_ref0 Поддержка: @lexygpt_support

82/100
cleanliness index
Grade A
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
200734
Median views
9975
ERR
5.0%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Technology

Evidence snapshot

The @lexygpt assessment dated 2026-08-14 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 200,734 subscribers, median post views were 9,975, ERR was 5.0%, and the cleanliness index was 82/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

A small share of subscribers sees each post, limiting likely advertising reach.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 5,652–7,875 views.

What grade A means

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

Run a fresh check for @lexygpt

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-14. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @lexygpt

Questions about @lexygpt

What does grade A mean for @lexygpt?

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

What is the ERR of @lexygpt?

ERR is 5.0%. Median post views equal 5.0% of the channel's 200,734 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 82/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @lexygpt