TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @lexygpt

@lexygpt: statistics and cleanliness index

Lexy | Промты • ИИ • Новости

Создаю премиум-портреты из ваших фото. Как после съемки у топ-фотографа ✨ Попробуй: https://t.me/lexygpt_bot?start=NEWS_ref0 Поддержка: @lexygpt_support

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-17
Subscribers
199,948
Median views
10,349
ERR
5.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science
Post language Russian
Channel age 1 year

Data from 2026-09-17 — 22 days old.

Assessment summary

With zero fraud risk and a stable 10 thousand views per publication, placing ads here is questionable solely due to the conveyor-belt format: the feed updates nearly 11 times a day, causing a post to lose visibility in just a couple of hours.

The channel operates as a showcase for its own neural network bot with prompts, so without a paid pin or a strict time-slot at the top, an advertising message will be instantly washed away by the stream of generations.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 12 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 81,995 to 294,734 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 7 of 12
@lexygpt 5.2%
similar channels median 5.5%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 7 of 11
@lexygpt 0.21
similar channels median 0.28

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 13 to Sep 17. The dashed line is the median (10,349).

07K14KSep 13: 13,834 viewsSep 13: 14,032 viewsSep 13: 14,074 viewsSep 14: 12,995 viewsSep 14: 13,128 viewsSep 14: 12,260 viewsSep 14: 12,646 viewsSep 14: 12,151 viewsSep 14: 12,261 viewsSep 14: 12,114 viewsSep 14: 12,280 viewsSep 14: 11,900 viewsSep 14: 12,025 viewsSep 14: 11,539 viewsSep 14: 12,379 viewsSep 15: 11,170 viewsSep 15: 11,222 viewsSep 15: 10,305 viewsSep 15: 10,430 viewsSep 15: 10,393 viewsSep 15: 10,483 viewsSep 15: 10,098 viewsSep 15: 10,043 viewsSep 15: 10,052 viewsSep 15: 10,001 viewsSep 15: 10,237 viewsSep 16: 8,641 viewsSep 16: 8,699 viewsSep 16: 7,851 viewsSep 16: 7,821 viewsSep 16: 7,553 viewsSep 16: 7,622 viewsSep 16: 7,246 viewsSep 16: 7,285 viewsSep 16: 6,694 viewsSep 16: 6,861 viewsSep 17: 3,524 viewsSep 17: 3,522 viewsSep 17: 1,940 viewsSep 17: 1,970 views Sep 13Sep 17
  • post views
  • 10 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 10,349

Maximum: 14,074 views. Data as of Sep 17.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 27: index 95, grade A+Jun 27Aug 14: index 82, grade AAug 14Sep 17: index 100, grade A+Sep 17

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 6,861–10,043 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @lexygpt

Are there any signs of audience inflation on the channel?

No signs of manipulation were found: the risk score is 0 out of 100, and views are distributed evenly without abnormal spikes.

What reach will an advertising post receive?

The median reach of a single post is about 10.3 thousand views, corresponding to an ERR engagement rate of approximately 5.2% of the total subscriber base.

Why is placing an ad considered questionable?

The channel publishes nearly 11 posts a day, so a post gets pushed down the feed very quickly and risks not gaining the expected attention without top-retention conditions.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-17
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @lexygpt assessment dated 2026-09-17 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 199,948 subscribers, median post views were 10,349, ERR was 5.2%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.