TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @bezsmuzi

@bezsmuzi: statistics and cleanliness index

Русский ИТ бизнес

Рассказываю как строю свой ИТ-бизнес в России без "маркетинговой чепухи". Ежедневно делюсь нашим опытом и неудачами. Автор - @maximkulgin Чат, где все обсуждаем: https://t.me/joinchat/C8jihRK_eQ1_SIFtzgOZLQ https://clck.ru/3GX4rp - РКН

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-01
Subscribers
32,170
Median views
2,355
ERR
7.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Business & startups

Data from 2026-09-01 — 37 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates natural audience dynamics with a stable median of around 2355 views and zero risk of manipulation. However, advertising here is questionable solely due to the conveyor-like pace of the feed: with 24 posts per day, an ad post will be pushed out of sight in literally an hour.

Under these conditions, the advertiser pays only for a short burst of attention at the moment of publication, rather than for long-term views.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 24 Business & startups catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 10,734 to 76,656 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 17 of 24
@bezsmuzi 7.3%
similar channels median 9.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 13 of 20
@bezsmuzi 0.37
similar channels median 0.6

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 30 to Sep 1. The dashed line is the median (2,355).

01.4K2.9KAug 30: 2,832 viewsAug 30: 2,893 viewsAug 30: 2,838 viewsAug 30: 2,727 viewsAug 31: 2,610 viewsAug 31: 2,576 viewsAug 31: 2,437 viewsAug 31: 2,481 viewsAug 31: 2,483 viewsAug 31: 2,382 viewsAug 31: 2,423 viewsAug 31: 2,374 viewsAug 31: 2,409 viewsAug 31: 2,435 viewsAug 31: 2,395 viewsAug 31: 2,275 viewsAug 31: 2,318 viewsAug 31: 2,242 viewsAug 31: 2,268 viewsAug 31: 2,262 viewsAug 31: 2,143 viewsAug 31: 2,310 viewsAug 31: 2,264 viewsAug 31: 2,347 viewsAug 31: 2,356 viewsAug 31: 2,354 viewsAug 31: 2,386 viewsAug 31: 2,381 viewsAug 31: 2,351 viewsAug 31: 2,357 viewsAug 31: 2,356 viewsSep 1: 1,981 viewsSep 1: 1,977 viewsSep 1: 1,797 viewsSep 1: 1,917 viewsSep 1: 1,745 viewsSep 1: 1,641 viewsSep 1: 1,375 viewsSep 1: 1,070 viewsSep 1: 630 views Aug 30Sep 1
  • post views
  • 27 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 2,355

Maximum: 2,893 views. Data as of Sep 1.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 7: index 99, grade A+Jul 7Sep 1: index 100, grade A+Sep 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 2,217–2,426 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 1 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @bezsmuzi

Are there any signs of view or subscriber manipulation on the channel?

No, the channel received a minimum risk score of 0 out of 100, and subscriber dynamics (+975 over 55 days) along with view stability correspond to a completely genuine audience.

Why is the feasibility of advertising marked as questionable?

The main limitation of the channel is conveyor-style posting at a frequency of more than 24 posts per day, which causes the ad post to be quickly buried under new content and pushed down.

What reach can be expected upon publication?

You should expect a median of 2355 views per post, but due to the high feed density, almost all of this reach will be gathered within the first one to two hours.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @bezsmuzi assessment dated 2026-09-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 32,170 subscribers, median post views were 2,355, ERR was 7.3%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.