TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @neuroset_vidit

@neuroset_vidit: statistics and cleanliness index

Нейросеть видит

Публикуем самые интересные и загадочные картины, созданные нейросетью По рекламе: @stanik Купить через биржу https://telega.in/channels/neyroset_vidit/card Менеджер: @Spiral_Yuri @maxisini Social_Energy

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-19
Subscribers
127,953
Median views
5,845
ERR
4.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-09-19 — 19 days old.

Assessment summary

A low risk of artificial inflation is paired with severe audience burnout: out of nearly 128 thousand subscribers, fewer than 6 thousand people view the publications.

The channel is losing readers (down 1,817 over the month), and a third of the posts are deleted; therefore, an advertiser should evaluate the cost solely based on the actual 5.8K views rather than the nominal subscriber base.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 16 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 45,235 to 294,734 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 12 of 16
@neuroset_vidit 4.6%
similar channels median 6%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 12 of 14
@neuroset_vidit 0.72
similar channels median 0.23

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 7 to Sep 19. The dashed line is the median (5,845).

03.5K7KSep 7: 5,853 viewsSep 7: 6,532 viewsSep 7: 6,345 viewsSep 8: 5,812 viewsSep 8: 5,837 viewsSep 8: 6,575 viewsSep 8: 7,029 viewsSep 8: 5,809 viewsSep 8: 5,235 viewsSep 8: 6,487 viewsSep 9: 6,500 viewsSep 9: 6,194 viewsSep 9: 6,431 viewsSep 10: 6,433 viewsSep 10: 6,599 viewsSep 10: 6,986 viewsSep 10: 6,767 viewsSep 11: 6,049 viewsSep 11: 5,920 viewsSep 11: 6,088 viewsSep 11: 6,218 viewsSep 12: 6,195 viewsSep 12: 6,306 viewsSep 13: 5,992 viewsSep 13: 5,591 viewsSep 14: 5,496 viewsSep 14: 5,768 viewsSep 15: 5,448 viewsSep 15: 4,663 viewsSep 15: 4,619 viewsSep 15: 4,705 viewsSep 16: 4,588 viewsSep 16: 4,554 viewsSep 17: 4,442 viewsSep 17: 4,236 viewsSep 18: 3,354 viewsSep 18: 2,816 viewsSep 18: 2,701 viewsSep 18: 2,774 viewsSep 19: 970 views Sep 7Sep 19
  • post views
  • 4 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 5,845

Maximum: 7,029 views. Data as of Sep 19.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 30: index 86, grade AJun 30Aug 18: index 86, grade AAug 18Sep 19: index 90, grade ASep 19

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 2,719–3,220 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 1 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 2 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @neuroset_vidit

Are there signs of audience inflation on the channel?

No technical signs of artificial inflation were detected; the risk score is a minimal 10 out of 100. Views are distributed evenly, and the unsubscribe trend looks natural for an established channel.

What real reach will an ad publication get?

The median reach is about 5,845 views per post. With a posting frequency of just over 3 posts per day, the content will not drown immediately, but it will be seen by only a small fraction of the 128 thousand subscribers.

Why is advertising on the channel marked as questionable?

The reason is the low relative reach: fewer than 5% of the audience read the posts, and the subscriber base is gradually shrinking. Buying ads here makes sense only if the price is calculated based on the actual 5.8 thousand views rather than the total number of readers.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-19
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @neuroset_vidit assessment dated 2026-09-19 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 127,953 subscribers, median post views were 5,845, ERR was 4.6%, and the cleanliness index was 90/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.