TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @JarvisNew

Fake engagement check for @JarvisNew

Джарвис Ньюс | Нейросети — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-19.

Госуслуги: № 7147913954 Джарвис, твой новостной ассистент в мире нейросетей. Лучший контент — здесь! 💎 Реклама: @niktwix 📢 Прайс: t.me/newchannel_media/68 Менеджер: @Spiral_Yuri Сотрудничем: @Tgpodbor_official

95/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
87103
Median views
5290
ERR
6.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Technology

Evidence snapshot

The @JarvisNew assessment dated 2026-08-19 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 87,103 subscribers, median post views were 5,290, ERR was 6.1%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 1,442–1,564 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @JarvisNew

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-19. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @JarvisNew

Questions about @JarvisNew

What does grade A+ mean for @JarvisNew?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @JarvisNew?

ERR is 6.1%. Median post views equal 6.1% of the channel's 87,103 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 95/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @JarvisNew