TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @JarvisNew

@JarvisNew: statistics and cleanliness index

Джарвис Ньюс | Нейросети

Госуслуги: № 7147913954 Джарвис, твой новостной ассистент в мире нейросетей. Лучший контент — здесь! 💎 Реклама: @niktwix 📢 Прайс: t.me/newchannel_media/68 Менеджер: @Spiral_Yuri Сотрудничем: @Tgpodbor_official

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-21
Subscribers
86,450
Median views
4,045
ERR
4.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science
Post language Russian
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-09-21 — 18 days old.

Assessment summary

A score of 30 indicates moderate boosting risks, but advertising here is questionable: fewer than 5% of the 86,000 subscribers read the posts, and over the past month views dropped from 5.2k to 4k. Combined with unnaturally uniform metrics across posts (CV 0.13) and disabled comments, this points to audience burnout.

Paying for an integration makes sense only based on the actual 4,000 impressions, not the total subscriber count.

What to pay attention to

Views do not mature (old ≈ fresh, ×0.97)

Older posts usually collect 1.5–3 times more views than day-old ones, because people keep reading them. Here older posts collected about as many as fresh ones. Caveat: there are only 1 day-old posts in the sample — too few to judge the channel, so this observation counts as weak.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 22 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 29,912 to 207,873 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 16 of 22
@JarvisNew 4.7%
similar channels median 7.6%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 7 to Sep 20. The dashed line is the median (4,045).

02.8K5.6KSep 7: 3,545 viewsSep 7: 3,700 viewsSep 7: 3,445 viewsSep 7: 3,812 viewsSep 8: 4,451 viewsSep 8: 3,927 viewsSep 8: 4,383 viewsSep 9: 3,662 viewsSep 9: 4,360 viewsSep 9: 4,324 viewsSep 9: 4,144 viewsSep 9: 3,986 viewsSep 9: 4,040 viewsSep 9: 3,992 viewsSep 9: 3,909 viewsSep 9: 3,864 viewsSep 9: 4,153 viewsSep 9: 3,831 viewsSep 9: 4,012 viewsSep 9: 4,283 viewsSep 9: 3,650 viewsSep 9: 3,787 viewsSep 9: 3,633 viewsSep 9: 3,716 viewsSep 9: 3,554 viewsSep 9: 3,514 viewsSep 10: 5,252 viewsSep 11: 5,106 viewsSep 11: 4,456 viewsSep 12: 3,786 viewsSep 13: 4,735 viewsSep 14: 4,387 viewsSep 14: 5,570 viewsSep 15: 5,472 viewsSep 16: 4,761 viewsSep 17: 4,792 viewsSep 17: 4,800 viewsSep 18: 4,807 viewsSep 19: 4,401 viewsSep 20: 4,050 views Sep 7Sep 20
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 4,045

Maximum: 5,570 views. Data as of Sep 21.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views do not mature (old ≈ fresh, ×0.97)

Older posts usually collect 1.5–3 times more views than day-old ones, because people keep reading them. Here older posts collected about as many as fresh ones. Caveat: there are only 1 day-old posts in the sample — too few to judge the channel, so this observation counts as weak.

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.13)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 30: index 55, grade CJun 30Aug 19: index 95, grade A+Aug 19Sep 21: index 70, grade BSep 21

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 4,138–4,313 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 4,421 views versus 4,002 for regular posts — 10% higher.

Based on 4 advertising and 34 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 4 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @JarvisNew

Is there obvious boosting on the channel?

The channel received a risk score of 30 out of 100 (green zone), and there is no obvious evidence of massive fraud. However, the suspiciously even view pattern (CV 0.13) may indicate background view boosting.

How many people will actually see an ad post?

The median reach is about 4,000 views per post, or less than 5% of the total audience. Promotional posts gather similar numbers — an average of about 4.4k views.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

The reason for this verdict is the low share of active readers relative to the subscriber base. For a channel with 86,000 readers, the reach is low, so the cost of integration should be evaluated strictly based on actual impressions.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-21
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @JarvisNew assessment dated 2026-09-21 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 86,450 subscribers, median post views were 4,045, ERR was 4.7%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.