С 17 лет батрачу в маркетинге. Защитил диплом, чтобы вести этот канал. Просто и с юморком разжевываю тренды, кейсы и другие умные слова ex Сбер, МегаФон, Перекрёсток и VK Приемная граждан и реклама: @peachforme РКН: https://clck.ru/3GMsB3
checked 2026-09-03
- Subscribers
- 102,878
- Median views
- 27,292
- ERR
- 26.5%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
The channel demonstrates stable organic activity typical of a personal blog: with an audience of over 100k subscribers, publications consistently gain around 27k views, and the low variation in views (CV 0.22) confirms the presence of a steady, loyal core of readers. The complete absence of reposts and a low ad load (8%) preserve the value of ad contacts. The main operational factor is the posting frequency of about 3 posts per day: a publication shifts down the feed during the day, so the return will depend on how organically the native integration fits into the author's style.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 13 checked Marketing & PR channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 9 to 696,042 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-03
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @maratyus assessment dated 2026-09-03 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 102,878 subscribers, median post views were 27,292, ERR was 26.5%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
About 13,646–23,756 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 2 more are too fresh.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 21 to Sep 3. The dashed line is the median (27,292).
- post views
- 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 27,292
Maximum: 39,030 views. Data as of Sep 3.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-03 — 17 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @maratyus and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @maratyusQuestions about @maratyus
Are there any signs of audience inflation detected on the channel?
No, the channel has a zero risk score (0 out of 100) with open comments and natural reaction levels.
What post reach can an advertiser expect?
The median reach of a single post is around 27.3k views, providing a high ERR engagement rate of 26.5%.
Is buying ads on this platform justified?
Yes, placement is justified: the channel is run in the first person with unique content, is not cluttered with reposts, and maintains an ad share within 8%.
Similar channels in Marketing & PR
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
- 98 · A+
- 94 · A+
- 81 · A
All channels in Marketing & PR
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.