TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @zapwork

Fake engagement check for @zapwork

Удалёнщики | удаленная работа — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-18.

Работа мечты 💻 👉 Купить рекламу https://reklama.expert-book.pro/telegram Менеджер @JaMasha 📨 Разместить вакансию — @netvorking_bot 📖 Реклама внутри книги https://expert-book.pro/pp 🥇 Напишем книгу под ключ и усилим ваш бренд: https://expert-book.pro/

95/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
127140
Median views
10754
ERR
8.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Business

Evidence snapshot

The @zapwork assessment dated 2026-08-18 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 127,140 subscribers, median post views were 10,754, ERR was 8.5%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 4,223–8,444 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @zapwork

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-18. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @zapwork

Questions about @zapwork

What does grade A+ mean for @zapwork?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @zapwork?

ERR is 8.5%. Median post views equal 8.5% of the channel's 127,140 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 95/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @zapwork