TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @frilans

Fake engagement check for @frilans

Фриланс | Удаленная работа — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-14.

Самые актуальных вакансий в мире фриланса Здесь требуются: - Дизайнеры - SMMщики - Маркетологи - Копирайтинг - Рилсмейкеры - Сценаристы - Админы каналов ➡️ Размещение вакансий/резюме @Helloo81 ➡️ Реклама @Helloo81

92/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
10359
Median views
612
ERR
5.9%
Posts sampled
39
Niche
Business

Evidence snapshot

The @frilans assessment dated 2026-08-14 uses 39 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 10,359 subscribers, median post views were 612, ERR was 5.9%, and the cleanliness index was 92/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 363–484 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @frilans

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-14. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @frilans

Questions about @frilans

What does grade A+ mean for @frilans?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @frilans?

ERR is 5.9%. Median post views equal 5.9% of the channel's 10,359 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 92/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @frilans