TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @xsutake

@xsutake: statistics and cleanliness index

𝒶𝓉𝓇𝑒𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓈 reviews

Мой лс- @Chefkas Скупка Нфт / до 700$

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
5,531
Median views
159
ERR
2.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is an archive of reviews for digital gift and star deals, where no posts have been published for over a month, and the subscriber base has decreased by more than a thousand over the past 54 days.

With a median of only 159 views per 5.5 thousand readers, a post will get lost among the passive audience, making third-party ad placement here questionable.

What to pay attention to

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.9%

View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. This may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 17 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 1,975 to 16,000 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 17 of 17
@xsutake 2.9%
similar channels median 17.5%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 17
@xsutake 0.72
similar channels median 0.81

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 24 to Aug 7. The dashed line is the median (159).

05401.1KJul 24: 91 viewsJul 24: 244 viewsJul 24: 246 viewsJul 24: 116 viewsJul 24: 195 viewsJul 24: 181 viewsJul 24: 131 viewsJul 24: 80 viewsJul 24: 51 viewsJul 24: 47 viewsJul 24: 45 viewsJul 24: 45 viewsJul 24: 104 viewsJul 24: 79 viewsJul 24: 931 viewsJul 24: 758 viewsJul 24: 764 viewsJul 24: 540 viewsJul 24: 373 viewsJul 24: 279 viewsJul 24: 219 viewsJul 24: 187 viewsJul 24: 180 viewsJul 24: 180 viewsJul 24: 226 viewsJul 24: 138 viewsJul 24: 117 viewsJul 24: 117 viewsJul 24: 119 viewsJul 24: 91 viewsJul 24: 98 viewsJul 24: 93 viewsJul 24: 93 viewsJul 24: 88 viewsJul 24: 109 viewsJul 24: 1,081 viewsJul 27: 992 viewsAug 6: 671 viewsAug 7: 643 viewsAug 7: 653 views Jul 24Aug 7
  • post views
  • median 159

Maximum: 1,081 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.9%

View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. This may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 16: index 50, grade DJul 16Sep 8: index 79, grade BSep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

No new posts for over two weeks, so ad reach can't be forecast right now.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @xsutake

What is the channel's artificial inflation risk level?

The risk score is in the green zone (21/100), and no signs of large-scale artificial inflation have been detected.

What real reach do the posts get?

The median reach is about 159 views per post with more than 5.5 thousand subscribers, which corresponds to an ERR of around 2.9%.

Is it advisable to buy advertising on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable: posts are viewed by a small portion of the audience, the feed has not been updated for more than a month and serves only as a showcase of reviews for private deals.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @xsutake assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 5,531 subscribers, median post views were 159, ERR was 2.9%, and the cleanliness index was 79/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.