TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @XPoizon

@XPoizon: statistics and cleanliness index

Подпишись 🙋‍♂️ 🗣️Наш бот @XPoizonBot  🗣️Отзывы @ReviewXPoizon  🗣️Предложения/жалобы @XpoizonSupport ✅Оформить заказ @RomanovPoizon

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-04
Subscribers
57,776
Median views
32,612
ERR
56.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Fashion

Data from 2026-09-04 — 34 days old.

Assessment summary

With an extremely low posting frequency (one post every few days), each message stays visible for a long time and gathers a high share of views relative to the subscriber base.

The 34% deleted posts rate is typical for storefront channels that periodically clean up finished giveaways and expired promotions, while the narrow circle of commenters is explained by a tight-knit core of regular delivery service customers.

What to pay attention to

Comments are written by a narrow circle of accounts (27 out of 82)

The share of unique commenters is low — the discussion relies on a small group of accounts. It may also be an active core of readers.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Fashion catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 24,166 to 160,881 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 6 of 6
@XPoizon 56.4%
similar channels median 19%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 3 of 5
@XPoizon 1.63
similar channels median 1.93

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jan 13 to Sep 2. The dashed line is the median (32,612).

023K45KJan 13: 36,431 viewsJan 28: 28,618 viewsFeb 26: 27,412 viewsFeb 26: 27,335 viewsFeb 26: 26,905 viewsFeb 26: 26,952 viewsFeb 26: 26,900 viewsFeb 26: 27,131 viewsMar 27: 20,842 viewsMar 27: 20,901 viewsMar 27: 21,038 viewsApr 5: 32,716 viewsApr 5: 32,830 viewsApr 5: 32,631 viewsApr 5: 32,594 viewsMay 12: 29,793 viewsMay 12: 29,882 viewsMay 12: 30,037 viewsMay 28: 28,956 viewsMay 28: 29,113 viewsMay 28: 29,043 viewsMay 28: 29,026 viewsJun 3: 23,947 viewsJun 12: 33,519 viewsJun 20: 1,561 viewsJun 20: 35,541 viewsJul 5: 42,541 viewsJul 5: 43,625 viewsJul 6: 35,783 viewsJul 8: 37,617 viewsJul 9: 42,291 viewsJul 17: 43,325 viewsJul 17: 43,433 viewsJul 17: 43,832 viewsJul 17: 43,315 viewsJul 28: 33,547 viewsJul 28: 37,300 viewsAug 11: 45,162 viewsAug 19: 42,895 viewsSep 2: 41,865 views Jan 13Sep 2
  • post views
  • median 32,612

Maximum: 45,162 views. Data as of Sep 4.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 5: index 93, grade A+Aug 5Sep 4: index 89, grade ASep 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 35,585 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @XPoizon

What is the risk of audience inflation on the channel?

The risk is minimal: the channel scored 11 out of 100 with high check confidence. The subscriber growth dynamics and stable view dispersion (CV 0.26) match the metrics of an organic audience.

What post reach can be expected?

The median reach is 32,612 views with an audience of 57,776 subscribers (ERR around 56%). Due to infrequent posting, a post does not get buried in the feed and accumulates views over several days.

Is buying ads on this channel justified?

Placement is considered justified; the channel demonstrates healthy engagement. Since third-party integrations are completely absent on the channel, it is important to clarify the format and terms for accepting external advertising with the owner in advance.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-04
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @XPoizon assessment dated 2026-09-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 57,776 subscribers, median post views were 32,612, ERR was 56.4%, and the cleanliness index was 89/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.