TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @WorldOfPoizon

Fake engagement check for @WorldOfPoizon

World Of Poizon - мир пойзон — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-16.

Сервис «Мир пойзон» - подпишись! 🛍️Оформить заказ @DimaOfWorld 🤖Наш бот @WorldOfPoizonBot 💬Отзывы @ReviewOfWorld 📝Предложения/жалобы @SupOfWorld

98/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
57164
Median views
21472
ERR
37.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @WorldOfPoizon assessment dated 2026-08-16 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 57,164 subscribers, median post views were 21,472, ERR was 37.6%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 12,963–25,291 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @WorldOfPoizon

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-16. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @WorldOfPoizon

Questions about @WorldOfPoizon

What does grade A+ mean for @WorldOfPoizon?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @WorldOfPoizon?

ERR is 37.6%. Median post views equal 37.6% of the channel's 57,164 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 98/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @WorldOfPoizon