TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @wow_tkrf

@wow_tkrf: statistics and cleanliness index

О ТРУДОВОМ ПРАВЕ И КАДРОВОМ УЧЕТЕ

Канал аудитора Татьяны Лисовой Обратная связь, консультации @wow_tkrf_bot РКН https://clck.ru/3Fv6eH Реклама @PR_wowtkrf_bot https://telega.in/c/wow_tkrf

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-15
Subscribers
14,702
Median views
846
ERR
5.8%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Jurisprudence
Post language Russian
Channel age 6 years

Data from 2026-10-15 — 23 days old.

Assessment summary

Channel on labor law and HR records: auditor Tatyana Lisova analyzes articles of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, recent court practice and changes in laws, and on weekends conducts polls for HR specialists. The channel is almost seven years old, the feed runs steadily — 1.2 posts per day, mostly text.

In terms of reach, the channel stays in the middle among similar catalog channels, but views over the month have dropped — the median fell from 979 to 846 with an almost unchanged subscriber base. Ad posts get 5% more than regular ones, so ad reach here is not declining.

About the channel

Channel about labor law and HR records: auditor Tatyana Lisova analyzes articles of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, recent court practice and changes in laws for HR specialists and HR professionals. It has been run in Russian for almost seven years, mostly with text posts featuring analyses and polls.

In the catalog, the channel stands next to @ohranatruda_official, @whrdata and @savetoreadlater. It is smaller than each of them in subscriber count, but a larger share of subscribers sees a post than for @whrdata, and approximately the same as for @savetoreadlater.

What it publishes:

  • Labor Code of the Russian Federation analyses: how to apply articles in practice — for example, the date of contract termination upon an employee's death.
  • Court practice: rulings of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction on layoffs, dismissals and vacation pay.
  • Changes in laws: new regulations and quotas — for foreign workers and self-employed individuals.
  • Polls for HR specialists: on weekends — a practical question with answer options.

Posts are published mainly in the morning and on weekdays; sometimes the channel forwards materials from “Olga Vyunik/ all about labor migration” and “Kadrovoe Delo magazine”. The feed consists of short text analyses and polls; there are few forwards.

By subscribers, it ranks #5 of 7 channels in the Jurisprudence niche of the catalog.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Jurisprudence catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 471 to 992,933 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 5 of 6
@wow_tkrf 5.8%
similar channels median 9.2%
Reactions per 100 views at the median
@wow_tkrf 0.67
similar channels median 0.91

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 11 to Oct 15. The dashed line is the median (846).

06311.3KSep 11: 990 viewsSep 12: 959 viewsSep 14: 903 viewsSep 15: 892 viewsSep 15: 785 viewsSep 16: 1,052 viewsSep 17: 1,134 viewsSep 18: 1,099 viewsSep 19: 1,006 viewsSep 20: 889 viewsSep 21: 831 viewsSep 22: 903 viewsSep 22: 851 viewsSep 23: 803 viewsSep 23: 730 viewsSep 23: 712 viewsSep 24: 1,263 viewsSep 25: 1,009 viewsSep 26: 874 viewsSep 28: 841 viewsSep 28: 872 viewsSep 29: 919 viewsSep 30: 842 viewsSep 30: 907 viewsOct 1: 992 viewsOct 2: 886 viewsOct 2: 1,018 viewsOct 4: 807 viewsOct 5: 779 viewsOct 5: 685 viewsOct 6: 671 viewsOct 7: 667 viewsOct 8: 738 viewsOct 9: 763 viewsOct 10: 696 viewsOct 12: 567 viewsOct 13: 531 viewsOct 14: 414 viewsOct 14: 368 viewsOct 15: 293 views Sep 11Oct 15
  • post views
  • 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 846

Maximum: 1,263 views. Data as of Oct 15.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 12: index 100, grade A+Sep 12Oct 15: index 100, grade A+Oct 15

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 346–391 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 907 views versus 861 for regular posts — 5% higher.

Based on 5 advertising and 32 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 5 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @wow_tkrf

Does @wow_tkrf have inflated metrics?

The purity index is 100 out of 100, grade A+, level “metrics are normal”: the check found no deviations that lower the index.

What is the reach of the channel's posts?

The median views is 846, which is about 5.8% of the subscriber base. Ad posts get 5% more than regular ones.

Is it worth advertising here?

The check marks placement as justified. Ad posts are not inferior to regular ones in reach, and the purity index is maximal.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-15
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @wow_tkrf assessment dated 2026-10-15 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 14,702 subscribers, median post views were 846, ERR was 5.8%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.