TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @warfakes

@warfakes: statistics and cleanliness index

Война с фейками

Опровергаем фейки с 2022 года. Предложить фейк: @WarFakesMessage_Bot Реклама: @wsfads_bot Канал в MAX: https://max.ru/warfakes

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-30
Subscribers
373,206
Median views
90,302
ERR
24.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche News and Media
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-09-30 — 8 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is dedicated to socio-political fact-checking and analysis of current news, regularly publishing debunking materials in photo and video formats.

Posts are published moderately — around five times a day, and the ad load is only 2% of the feed, ensuring that an integration gets high reader attention without the risk of instantly getting lost in the stream.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 27 News and Media catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 125,180 to 1,115,156 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 24 of 27
@warfakes 24.2%
similar channels median 11.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 13 of 23
@warfakes 0.97
similar channels median 1.52

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 22 to Sep 30. The dashed line is the median (90,302).

0118K236KSep 22: 97,349 viewsSep 22: 101,891 viewsSep 22: 97,238 viewsSep 22: 98,384 viewsSep 22: 98,877 viewsSep 22: 100,699 viewsSep 22: 101,760 viewsSep 23: 87,438 viewsSep 23: 91,668 viewsSep 23: 87,044 viewsSep 23: 86,459 viewsSep 23: 111,857 viewsSep 23: 106,324 viewsSep 24: 89,645 viewsSep 24: 84,896 viewsSep 24: 84,418 viewsSep 24: 85,345 viewsSep 24: 87,423 viewsSep 25: 90,337 viewsSep 25: 235,923 viewsSep 25: 88,580 viewsSep 25: 90,268 viewsSep 26: 83,014 viewsSep 26: 82,017 viewsSep 26: 82,801 viewsSep 27: 96,639 viewsSep 27: 99,870 viewsSep 27: 99,028 viewsSep 28: 105,946 viewsSep 28: 103,051 viewsSep 28: 99,196 viewsSep 28: 98,663 viewsSep 28: 97,163 viewsSep 29: 58,686 viewsSep 29: 60,789 viewsSep 29: 46,941 viewsSep 30: 13,017 viewsSep 30: 10,204 viewsSep 30: 8,106 viewsSep 30: 7,492 views Sep 22Sep 30
  • post views
  • 6 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 90,302

Maximum: 235,923 views. Data as of Sep 30.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 46,727–97,913 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 2 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 2 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @warfakes

Are there any suspicious anomalies in @warfakes metrics?

The channel's Integrity Index is 99 out of 100 (grade A+, level "metrics are normal"). The analysis revealed no anomalies: view variation is natural, and technical gaps in post IDs do not exceed 3%.

What audience does a post in this channel reach?

On average, a post gets over 90 thousand views, which is about 24.2% of the total subscriber count. Certain high-profile debunking posts attract more than twice as much attention.

Is advertising in @warfakes justified?

Ad placement is considered justified. The channel has been active for more than four years, comments are open, and ads account for only 2% of content, ensuring good visibility for commercial materials.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-30
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @warfakes assessment dated 2026-09-30 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 373,206 subscribers, median post views were 90,302, ERR was 24.2%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.