TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @svarschiki

Fake engagement check for @svarschiki

⚔️ СВАРЩИКИ — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-14.

Мы знаем больше и готовы вам рассказать Прислать новость/медиа с фронта и тыла, а также по вопросам рекламы и сотрудничества: @PR_SVR_BOT Бот для зафронтовой деятельности @dva_majors_ND2_bot 7166193644

87/100
cleanliness index
Grade A
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
128750
Median views
57370
ERR
44.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
News

Evidence snapshot

The @svarschiki assessment dated 2026-08-14 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 128,750 subscribers, median post views were 57,370, ERR was 44.6%, and the cleanliness index was 87/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 42,291–61,880 views.

What grade A means

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

Run a fresh check for @svarschiki

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-14. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @svarschiki

Questions about @svarschiki

What does grade A mean for @svarschiki?

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

What is the ERR of @svarschiki?

ERR is 44.6%. Median post views equal 44.6% of the channel's 128,750 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 87/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @svarschiki