Я там, где война. Канал отставного опера. Силовик в МАХ — https://max.ru/belarusian_silovik Для связи с автором канала — @belarusian_svyaznoi Разбан(модераторы) — @belsilovik_bot Реклама — @struffshryde Регистрация канала — https://clck.ru/3QfH6D
checked 2026-09-10
- Subscribers
- 450,859
- Median views
- 92,903
- ERR
- 20.6%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
A low risk score confirms the organic nature of the metrics; however, a posting intensity of around 49 posts per day turns the channel into a news feed conveyor. Due to the rapid displacement of messages by new updates, the advertising contact will be very brief, meaning a standard ad placement without a top hold or pin will not yield prolonged audience attention.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 25 checked News and Media channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 154,405 to 1,302,292 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-10
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @belarusian_silovik assessment dated 2026-09-10 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 450,859 subscribers, median post views were 92,903, ERR was 20.6%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.
About 85,886–96,614 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 9 to Sep 10. The dashed line is the median (92,903).
- post views
- 40 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 92,903
Maximum: 102,272 views. Data as of Sep 10.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-10 — 10 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @belarusian_silovik and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @belarusian_silovikQuestions about @belarusian_silovik
Are there any signs of audience inflation on the channel?
No, the channel received a minimal risk score of 1/100 with high verification confidence. An even distribution of views and open comments indicate an authentic audience.
Why is ad placement considered questionable?
The reason lies in the high publishing frequency of around 49 posts per day. In such a high-volume feed, an advertising message is instantly pushed down by incoming news and loses visibility.
What reach can be expected upon publication?
The median reach is around 93 thousand views per post. The bulk of these views is accumulated in the first hours before the post gets buried under fresh updates.
Similar channels in News and Media
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
All channels in News and Media
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.