TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @vinchkkk

@vinchkkk: statistics and cleanliness index

винчик | картинки | нейросеть

№ 4976914318 Винчик – точно поднимет тебе настроение 🍷 самые необычные картины созданые нейросетью тут По вопросам сотрудничества @SMARTER_marketing Реестр РКН: https://clck.ru/3GSBKF

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-28
Subscribers
130,692
Median views
1,118
ERR
0.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Art & Design
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-09-28 — 10 days old.

Assessment summary

Despite an audience growth of more than 14 thousand people over three months, views remain around one thousand, and readers barely react to publications — there is less than one reaction per thousand views.

Due to publishing nearly 19 posts per day, an advertising post quickly shifts out of focus, making predicting real reach unreliable.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.9% with 130 692 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: a negligible portion of the audience sees the post. There are subscribers, but almost no views.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Channel content

🤖 Possible AI-generated content

Publications consist of AI-generated images with identical templated polls.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Art & Design catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 36 to 164,419 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 14 of 14
@vinchkkk 0.9%
similar channels median 85.9%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 14 of 14
@vinchkkk 0.09
similar channels median 2.41

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 26 to Sep 28. The dashed line is the median (1,118).

07951.6KSep 26: 1,158 viewsSep 26: 1,528 viewsSep 26: 1,384 viewsSep 26: 1,279 viewsSep 26: 1,490 viewsSep 26: 1,146 viewsSep 26: 1,591 viewsSep 27: 975 viewsSep 27: 1,300 viewsSep 27: 1,125 viewsSep 27: 1,021 viewsSep 27: 1,227 viewsSep 27: 834 viewsSep 27: 961 viewsSep 27: 1,410 viewsSep 27: 1,153 viewsSep 27: 1,135 viewsSep 27: 1,427 viewsSep 27: 1,394 viewsSep 27: 1,103 viewsSep 27: 1,111 viewsSep 27: 954 viewsSep 27: 1,258 viewsSep 27: 1,264 viewsSep 27: 1,253 viewsSep 27: 1,194 viewsSep 27: 1,196 viewsSep 28: 502 viewsSep 28: 510 viewsSep 28: 456 viewsSep 28: 337 viewsSep 28: 344 viewsSep 28: 322 viewsSep 28: 398 viewsSep 28: 242 viewsSep 28: 204 viewsSep 28: 198 viewsSep 28: 200 viewsSep 28: 200 viewsSep 28: 201 views Sep 26Sep 28
  • post views
  • 21 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,118

Maximum: 1,591 views. Data as of Sep 28.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.9% with 130 692 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: a negligible portion of the audience sees the post. There are subscribers, but almost no views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 30: index 35, grade FJun 30Sep 28: index 30, grade FSep 28

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 11 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 7 posts.

Questions about @vinchkkk

What is the risk score of the channel @vinchkkk?

The channel received 70 points out of 100, which corresponds to a red risk level. The main reasons for the high score are an extremely low view rate relative to subscribers and an almost complete absence of reactions.

What is the real reach of publications in the channel?

The median reach is 1 118 views per post, which corresponds to an ERR of around 0.86%. The vast majority of subscribers do not view outgoing materials.

Is it advisable to buy advertising on this channel?

The placement is marked as questionable. Views align poorly with the channel's other metrics, and the final reach forecast for the advertiser remains unreliable.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-28
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @vinchkkk assessment dated 2026-09-28 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 130,692 subscribers, median post views were 1,118, ERR was 0.9%, and the cleanliness index was 30/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.