японская мода привезу вещи с любых японских сайтов (больше информации в закрепе) отзывы: @threadfeedback наличие: @threadstock связь: @wistash самозанятый / инн 772609382699 чеки предоставляю
checked 2026-09-07
- Subscribers
- 3,000
- Median views
- 745
- ERR
- 24.8%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
High view variance (CV 1.20) and the deletion of about 93% of posts are typical for showcase channels that clear out sold items; however, this practice completely conceals reach history. For an advertiser, this creates a risk of unstable performance: views are distributed unevenly, and some of them may be artificially inflated.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 5 checked Fashion channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 1,433 to 5,394 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-07
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @threadarchive assessment dated 2026-09-07 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 3,000 subscribers, median post views were 745, ERR was 24.8%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
About 373–577 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
Some posts appear to have been deleted (≈93% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent posts — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad placements and conceal their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is indirect (posts may also be deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Jun 24 to Sep 7. The dashed line is the median (745).
- post views
- 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 745
Maximum: 7,105 views. Data as of Sep 7.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-07 — 13 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @threadarchive and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @threadarchiveQuestions about @threadarchive
Is it safe to buy ads on this channel?
Placement is considered questionable with a risk score of 50 out of 100. There is a possibility that views on posts may be partially inflated.
What actual reach will a post get?
The median is about 745 views per post with an audience of 3000 subscribers. At the same time, views are distributed unevenly (CV 1.20), so the final result may noticeably deviate from the average.
Why have over 90% of posts been deleted on the channel?
In marketplace channels, admins regularly delete sold listings, but this also prevents evaluating honest metrics and post retention for ads.
Similar channels in Fashion
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 98 · A+
- 93 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.