TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @cinziamasha

Fake engagement check for @cinziamasha

archive.fashion — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-09.

По заказу писать сюда вещи на руках, а также под заказ С 10:00 до 23;00

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-09
Subscribers
1,800
Median views
1,710
ERR
95.0%
Posts sampled
40

Assessment summary

Post reach on par with the total subscriber base is typical for a local resale catalog, where the audience specifically checks in for new designer clothing drops. Deleting 29% of posts is typical for clearing out sold items; however, an advertiser should take into account the publishing downtime of over a week and schedule placements strictly around the release of a fresh batch of goods.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 7 checked Fashion channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 95 to 57,776 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 6 of 7
95% for @cinziamasha similar channels median: 46.3%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 4 of 7
0.64 for @cinziamasha similar channels median: 1.07

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @cinziamasha assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,800 subscribers, median post views were 1,710, ERR was 95.0%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 1,257–1,721 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 6 to Aug 31. The dashed line is the median (1,710).

01.4K2.8KAug 6: 2,038 viewsAug 12: 1,405 viewsAug 12: 1,721 viewsAug 12: 1,610 viewsAug 12: 1,363 viewsAug 12: 1,699 viewsAug 12: 2,151 viewsAug 12: 2,832 viewsAug 13: 1,743 viewsAug 13: 1,464 viewsAug 13: 1,484 viewsAug 13: 1,938 viewsAug 15: 1,540 viewsAug 15: 2,021 viewsAug 15: 1,591 viewsAug 15: 2,213 viewsAug 15: 2,045 viewsAug 16: 1,287 viewsAug 16: 1,799 viewsAug 17: 1,997 viewsAug 18: 1,739 viewsAug 18: 2,287 viewsAug 18: 1,629 viewsAug 18: 1,587 viewsAug 18: 2,132 viewsAug 18: 1,768 viewsAug 22: 1,409 viewsAug 22: 1,940 viewsAug 22: 1,929 viewsAug 22: 1,541 viewsAug 22: 2,079 viewsAug 22: 1,675 viewsAug 22: 2,230 viewsAug 24: 2,277 viewsAug 24: 1,512 viewsAug 29: 890 viewsAug 29: 886 viewsAug 31: 752 viewsAug 31: 651 viewsAug 31: 645 views Aug 6Aug 31

Maximum: 2,832 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @cinziamasha

Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @cinziamasha and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @cinziamasha

Questions about @cinziamasha

Are there any signs of audience or view inflation on the channel?

The channel received a minimal risk score of 0/100: the reaction ratio, view consistency, and posting pace correspond to the natural behavior of a real audience.

Why is the post reach almost equal to the subscriber count?

With a base of 1,800 subscribers, the median view count is 1,710, which is typical for small rare-item stores where the entire collected client base actively monitors new arrivals.

Is buying ads on the archive.fashion channel justified?

Placement is considered justified due to the engaged niche audience, but it is most effective to schedule the integration on days when new arrivals are announced, so the ad does not fall into a feed lull.

Similar channels in Fashion

All channels in Fashion

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @cinziamasha