TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @cinziamasha

@cinziamasha: statistics and cleanliness index

archive.fashion

По заказу писать сюда вещи на руках, а также под заказ С 10:00 до 23;00 @archvesq

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-21
Subscribers
3,522
Median views
3,167
ERR
89.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Fashion
Post language Russian
Channel age 12 months

Data from 2026-10-21 — 16 days old.

Assessment summary

Shop channel: sells original Cinzia Araia sneakers, a Rick Owens jacket, and a Chloe bag — photo of the pair, sizes, price in dollars, order via direct messages. In a month and a half, the audience grew from 1800 to 3522 subscribers, and the median views — from 1710 to 3167.

ERR 89,9% — higher than that of any similar catalog channel, where the group median is 42,7%: the post is seen by more people than the channel has subscribers, and where these views come from is not visible from the data. There are no ads or forwards in the sample at all — the entire feed consists of its own product posts, and about a third of message numbers in the latest window have been deleted.

About the channel

Shop of original footwear and items: most of the feed is taken up by Cinzia Araia sneakers — photo of the pair, list of sizes, price in dollars, order via direct messages. Less often there are a Rick Owens jacket and a Chloe bag. They write in Russian, with short announcements; the channel is 11 months old.

In the catalog, next to it are @threadarchive and @aheadshop0 — this channel is larger than both in subscribers, and the share of subscribers who see a post is higher for it than for each of them. @cosm_brannd has almost twice as many subscribers, but it collects a noticeably smaller share of its base.

What it publishes:

  • Availability and sizes: listing of sizes in stock and notes “arriving tomorrow,” “44-45 have arrived.”
  • Prices and ordering: price in dollars and contact for ordering via direct messages.
  • Drops: announcements of new arrivals — “drop today,” “a very cool drop this evening.”
  • Original or fake: breakdown of differences by tongue, insole, and sole.

Posts come out mainly in the afternoon and evening, more often on weekdays; by number of subscribers the channel is in the middle of the “Fashion” niche. They write about once every two days, with short product posts without ads or forwards.

By subscribers, it ranks #15 of 26 channels in the Fashion niche of the catalog.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Fashion catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 1,248 to 7,193 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 6 of 6
@cinziamasha 89.9%
similar channels median 42.7%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 4 of 6
@cinziamasha 0.8
similar channels median 0.37

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 13 to Oct 20. The dashed line is the median (3,167).

02.5K5.1KAug 13: 2,665 viewsAug 13: 2,892 viewsAug 15: 3,159 viewsAug 15: 3,302 viewsAug 15: 3,175 viewsAug 16: 2,914 viewsAug 17: 3,224 viewsAug 18: 3,872 viewsAug 18: 3,558 viewsAug 18: 3,404 viewsAug 22: 3,756 viewsAug 22: 3,710 viewsAug 22: 4,116 viewsAug 22: 4,485 viewsAug 24: 4,909 viewsAug 29: 3,652 viewsSep 11: 2,885 viewsSep 14: 3,497 viewsSep 14: 3,069 viewsSep 16: 3,322 viewsSep 16: 4,015 viewsSep 16: 4,028 viewsSep 17: 5,083 viewsSep 23: 2,928 viewsSep 23: 3,480 viewsSep 30: 3,485 viewsOct 13: 3,433 viewsOct 13: 3,074 viewsOct 13: 2,929 viewsOct 14: 1,716 viewsOct 16: 1,420 viewsOct 16: 1,911 viewsOct 16: 1,448 viewsOct 16: 1,342 viewsOct 16: 1,324 viewsOct 17: 1,235 viewsOct 17: 1,148 viewsOct 19: 1,185 viewsOct 20: 1,280 viewsOct 20: 1,201 views Aug 13Oct 20
  • post views
  • median 3,167

Maximum: 5,083 views. Data as of Oct 21.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 9: index 100, grade A+Sep 9Oct 21: index 100, grade A+Oct 21

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 1,193–1,240 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @cinziamasha

Is the channel clean? Is there any artificial inflation here?

The purity index is 100 out of 100, grade A+, level “metrics within normal”: the check found no deviations that lower the index. Posts have more views than subscribers (ERR about 89,9%), but where these views come from is not visible from the data.

How many people see a post in this channel?

The median is 3167 views with 3522 subscribers, that is, ERR about 89,9%. The share of subscribers who see a post is higher than that of any similar catalog channel.

Is it worth advertising here?

Placement is marked as justified. No ad posts were found in the sample, so the reach of ad posts was not calculated: the feed consists entirely of the shop's own product posts.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-21
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @cinziamasha assessment dated 2026-10-21 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 3,522 subscribers, median post views were 3,167, ERR was 89.9%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.