TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @subsquadtg

Fake engagement check for @subsquadtg

Submission Squad TG — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-15.

Предложка - @SubsquadSupply_bot Чат - https://t.me/+tiuqMhzruwY0ZDRi Поддержать донатом - https://www.donationalerts.com/r/subsquad Подписаться на Boosty - https://boosty.to/subsquad Сотрудничество - @SubsquadSupply_bot

91/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
4480
Median views
2804
ERR
62.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Entertainment

Evidence snapshot

The @subsquadtg assessment dated 2026-08-15 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 4,480 subscribers, median post views were 2,804, ERR was 62.6%, and the cleanliness index was 91/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 971–1,942 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @subsquadtg

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-15. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @subsquadtg

Questions about @subsquadtg

What does grade A+ mean for @subsquadtg?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @subsquadtg?

ERR is 62.6%. Median post views equal 62.6% of the channel's 4,480 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 91/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @subsquadtg