TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @mf699

Fake engagement check for @mf699

Медвежий фарш — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-14.

Реклама в канале: @bupmgg Медвежий фарш PRIVATE: https://t.me/+zFna2yljDxllNzdi Мгновенный вход в PRIVATE: https://t.me/+XG3if_d26e4xMDYy Мы в MAX: https://max.ru/publicevilandlife

96/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
155526
Median views
11156
ERR
7.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Entertainment

Evidence snapshot

The @mf699 assessment dated 2026-08-14 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 155,526 subscribers, median post views were 11,156, ERR was 7.2%, and the cleanliness index was 96/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts are published very frequently, so an advertisement may move down the feed quickly.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 4,926–6,366 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @mf699

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-14. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @mf699

Questions about @mf699

What does grade A+ mean for @mf699?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @mf699?

ERR is 7.2%. Median post views equal 7.2% of the channel's 155,526 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 96/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @mf699