TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @Sportyx

@Sportyx: statistics and cleanliness index

Sportybet sure betting codes — cleanliness index and public reach metrics dated 2026-09-24.

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-24
Subscribers
20,491
Median views
7,316
ERR
35.7%
Posts sampled
1
Niche Bets & Gambling
Channel age 3 years

Little data, so this is a rough estimate.

Assessment summary

The channel is a placeholder landing page: out of 1,500 publications, only a single ad post remains in the feed, and no new posts have been published for more than two weeks.

With comments disabled and a massive history cleanup, the audience of 20,000 is highly likely inflated, so you should not expect any return from real users here.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 Bets & Gambling catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 7,147 to 34,230 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 8 of 9
35.7% for @Sportyx similar channels median: 10.8%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. An unusually high ERR also lowers the index.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-24
Sample
The latest 1 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Sportyx assessment dated 2026-09-24 uses 1 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 20,491 subscribers, median post views were 7,316, ERR was 35.7%, and the cleanliness index was 35/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Channel content

🚩 Possible scam or deception signals

The post promotes dubious schemes with "100% fixed matches" and redirects traffic to a third-party group.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Views diverge from the other metrics, so the reach forecast is unreliable.

Not calculated: views diverge from the other metrics, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

What grade F means

Many strong signals: reach, views, reactions or subscriber dynamics diverge sharply from usual values. The index is at its lowest.

What to pay attention to

Large audience (20,491) with almost no content (1 posts)

The channel has many subscribers but only a few posts. That is unusual for a channel of this size. There is little data, so the assessment is preliminary.

Data from 2026-09-24 — 2 days old.

Questions about @Sportyx

Is it worth advertising in this channel?

Placement is considered dubious: the risk score is 65 out of 100, and views may be partially or completely artificial.

Why does a channel with 20,000 subscribers have only one post?

About 100% of previous posts from the sampling window have been deleted. Such showcase channels are often used to temporarily funnel traffic to dubious projects.

Does a reach of 7,300 views reflect real activity?

With comments disabled, no regular posts, and only a single message in the feed, such reach is typical of view count inflation.

Similar channels

All channels in Bets & Gambling

The whole channel catalog

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. Channel owners can ask for an update or send a question — t.me/TGinspector_ru.