TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @onlineodds1

@onlineodds1: statistics and cleanliness index

ONLINE ODDS

⚽ Daily Correct Score Predictions 🎯 Free & VIP Tips 📊 Match Analysis & Results 🔥 High-Value Football Picks 👩‍💼 @Tipgenix

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-08-26
Subscribers
111,323
Median views
2,227
ERR
2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Other

Data from 2026-08-26 — 45 days old.

Assessment summary

On a channel with 111k subscribers, posts get just over 2k views (ERR around 2%), and more than half of the posts (52%) are regularly deleted.

This pattern, combined with disabled comments, is typical for betting projects that conceal failed predictions and retain a burned-out audience base, making the return from third-party advertising here questionable.

What to pay attention to

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.0%

View-based engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It might be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Channel content

🚩 Possible scam or deception signals

The feed shows signs of a betting scam: selling "100% fixed matches" (fixed games) and guarantees of easy money on sports betting.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 21 to Aug 26. The dashed line is the median (2,227).

01.3K2.6KAug 21: 2,058 viewsAug 21: 2,329 viewsAug 21: 2,240 viewsAug 21: 2,396 viewsAug 21: 2,442 viewsAug 22: 2,236 viewsAug 22: 2,203 viewsAug 22: 2,178 viewsAug 22: 2,403 viewsAug 22: 2,352 viewsAug 22: 1,868 viewsAug 22: 1,886 viewsAug 22: 2,001 viewsAug 22: 1,566 viewsAug 22: 1,606 viewsAug 22: 1,762 viewsAug 22: 1,753 viewsAug 22: 2,229 viewsAug 22: 2,198 viewsAug 22: 1,958 viewsAug 22: 2,363 viewsAug 22: 2,458 viewsAug 22: 2,474 viewsAug 22: 2,232 viewsAug 23: 2,187 viewsAug 23: 2,226 viewsAug 23: 2,457 viewsAug 23: 2,552 viewsAug 23: 2,326 viewsAug 23: 2,530 viewsAug 24: 2,296 viewsAug 24: 2,336 viewsAug 24: 2,397 viewsAug 24: 2,063 viewsAug 24: 2,155 viewsAug 25: 2,260 viewsAug 25: 2,188 viewsAug 25: 1,858 viewsAug 26: 996 viewsAug 26: 259 views Aug 21Aug 26
  • post views
  • 5 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 2,227

Maximum: 2,552 views. Data as of Aug 26.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.0%

View-based engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It might be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 1,642–2,206 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @onlineodds1

What risk level is set for the ONLINE ODDS channel?

The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 (yellow zone). The score was affected by low audience reach, disabled comments, and the deletion of about half of the published posts.

How many users actually see the posts?

The median reach per post is about 2,227 views with a total base of over 111k subscribers (ERR around 2.0%).

Is it advisable to advertise on this channel?

Placing ads is considered questionable because the real reach represents a negligible portion of the stated audience. Additionally, the feed includes the promotion of suspicious offers selling fixed matches.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-26
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @onlineodds1 assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 111,323 subscribers, median post views were 2,227, ERR was 2.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.