Fake engagement check for @onlineodds1
ONLINE ODDS — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-26.
⚽ Daily Correct Score Predictions 🎯 Free & VIP Tips 📊 Match Analysis & Results 🔥 High-Value Football Picks 👩💼 @Tipgenix
Assessment summary
On a channel with 111k subscribers, posts get just over 2k views (ERR around 2%), and more than half of the posts (52%) are regularly deleted. This pattern, combined with disabled comments, is typical for betting projects that conceal failed predictions and retain a burned-out audience base, making the return from third-party advertising here questionable.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-26
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @onlineodds1 assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 111,323 subscribers, median post views were 2,227, ERR was 2.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Channel content
🚩 Possible scam or deception signals
The feed shows signs of a betting scam: selling "100% fixed matches" (fixed games) and guarantees of easy money on sports betting.
This is a separate content signal and does not change the manipulation-risk score.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: not recommended.
A small share of subscribers sees each post, limiting likely advertising reach.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 1,642–2,206 views.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts were found among the latest 40 posts, so there is nothing to compare.
What grade D means
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
What to pay attention to
Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.0%
View-based engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It might be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 21 to Aug 26. The dashed line is the median (2,227).
- post views
- 5 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 2,227
The sample maximum is 2,552 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
What scoring found in the view pattern
Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.0%
View-based engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It might be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.
What could not be calculated
View maturation was not assessed: the channel publishes frequently, and every sampled post is newer than one week.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @onlineodds1Questions about @onlineodds1
What risk level is set for the ONLINE ODDS channel?
The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 (yellow zone). The score was affected by low audience reach, disabled comments, and the deletion of about half of the published posts.
How many users actually see the posts?
The median reach per post is about 2,227 views with a total base of over 111k subscribers (ERR around 2.0%).
Is it advisable to advertise on this channel?
Placing ads is considered questionable because the real reach represents a negligible portion of the stated audience. Additionally, the feed includes the promotion of suspicious offers selling fixed matches.
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.