TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @serialrugram

@serialrugram: statistics and cleanliness index

Российские сериалы Мелодрамы

Российские сериалы

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-06
Subscribers
1,888
Median views
1,300
ERR
68.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Movie
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-10-06 — 3 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel posts episodes and previews of Russian TV melodramas in video format. The feed has not been updated for a long time: the channel has been inactive for 106 days.

Although archive posts have a high reach relative to the subscriber base, audience response is minimal: the reaction rate is only 0.12% compared to the median 1.53% for similar channels in the directory, and due to the pause in posting, a new ad risks being ignored.

What to pay attention to

Views are flatter than usual (CV ≈ 0.15)

The variance in views between posts is lower than typical for channels (0.15–0.6): posts accumulate almost the exact same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 10 Movie catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 849 to 3,334 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 6 of 10
@serialrugram 68.9%
similar channels median 45.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 10
@serialrugram 0.12
similar channels median 1.53

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from May 20 to Jun 21. The dashed line is the median (1,300).

08771.8KMay 20: 1,142 viewsMay 20: 1,164 viewsMay 20: 1,099 viewsMay 23: 1,067 viewsMay 23: 1,022 viewsMay 23: 1,144 viewsMay 23: 1,169 viewsMay 23: 1,094 viewsMay 25: 1,201 viewsMay 25: 1,229 viewsMay 25: 1,286 viewsMay 25: 1,297 viewsMay 25: 1,304 viewsJun 1: 1,179 viewsJun 1: 1,193 viewsJun 1: 1,231 viewsJun 1: 1,235 viewsJun 1: 1,215 viewsJun 3: 1,215 viewsJun 3: 1,213 viewsJun 3: 1,255 viewsJun 3: 1,352 viewsJun 3: 1,345 viewsJun 5: 1,383 viewsJun 5: 1,498 viewsJun 5: 1,477 viewsJun 5: 1,494 viewsJun 5: 1,467 viewsJun 7: 1,492 viewsJun 13: 1,456 viewsJun 13: 1,482 viewsJun 13: 1,553 viewsJun 13: 1,571 viewsJun 13: 1,610 viewsJun 21: 1,553 viewsJun 21: 1,555 viewsJun 21: 1,618 viewsJun 21: 1,706 viewsJun 21: 1,755 viewsJun 21: 1,754 views May 20Jun 21
  • post views
  • median 1,300

Maximum: 1,755 views. Data as of Oct 6.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are flatter than usual (CV ≈ 0.15)

The variance in views between posts is lower than typical for channels (0.15–0.6): posts accumulate almost the exact same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 13: index 100, grade A+Jun 13Sep 9: index 50, grade DSep 9Oct 6: index 70, grade BOct 6

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @serialrugram

What purity index is assigned to the channel @serialrugram?

The purity index is 70 out of 100 (grade B, level "metrics are normal"). The score was affected by third-party spam in discussions and an identical view count on most posts.

Is buying ads on this channel justified?

The feasibility of placing ads is considered questionable. The main reason is the absence of regular posts for over three months, making it hard to expect active view accumulation.

How does the audience react to the posted series?

The median reach of posts is 1,300 views (ERR 68.9%), but reader engagement is extremely low: only 0.12% of viewers leave reactions, which is lower than all similar channels in the sample.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-06
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @serialrugram assessment dated 2026-10-06 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,888 subscribers, median post views were 1,300, ERR was 68.9%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.