TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @seojob

@seojob: statistics and cleanliness index

SeoJob | Заработок в сети

👥 Мы команда SEO. Мы те кто платит за написание отзывов. Сайт: jobseo.ru Бот: @jobseo_bot Отзывы о нас: @seootzyvs_official

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-18
Subscribers
389,559
Median views
16,081
ERR
4.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Earnings
Post language Russian
Channel age 5 years

Data from 2026-10-18 — 19 days old.

Assessment summary

Service channel that pays for reviews on Yandex Maps and screenshots of advertising SMS: tasks in the bot, weekly participant leaderboards with prizes, and a referral program — all in branded green cards.

ERR 4.1% — higher than most similar channels in the catalog, but placement is marked as controversial precisely because of reach: a small share of subscribers reads the feed. Ad posts get 12% more than regular ones, and they post here rarely — about once every two days, so an ad stays in the feed for a long time.

About the channel

SeoJob service channel: here they pay for reviews on Yandex Maps and screenshots of old advertising SMS. It has been run for more than five years in Russian — mostly branded cards with tasks, sometimes videos and short text ads.

In the catalog, job and freelance channels are nearby. This one is noticeably larger than @udalennaya_rabota5, @koteyka_freelancer, and @vacancysmm, but its share of subscribers who see a post is lower than that of @udalennaya_rabota5 and higher than that of @koteyka_freelancer and @vacancysmm.

What it publishes:

  • Tasks: reviews on Yandex Maps and screenshots of advertising mailings — 5 ₽ each.
  • Top of the week: a list of participants with points and prizes up to 4000 ₽.
  • Referral program: 30% of invited users' earnings and 5% from the second level.
  • Service news: technical work in the bot, Web App update, payment for ideas.

Posts are published mainly during the day and on weekdays, about once every two days; there are no forwards from other channels, and third-party ads in the sample are about 5%. The feed is short cards about tasks and payouts, without long texts and almost without third-party ads.

By subscribers, it ranks #1 of 18 channels in the Earnings niche of the catalog.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

The feed is almost entirely promotion of its own bot: tasks, a two-level referral program, and promises of quick earnings for reviews and screenshots.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Earnings catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 134 to 307,487 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 14 of 14
@seojob 4.1%
similar channels median 22.3%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 12 of 14
@seojob 0.28
similar channels median 0.65

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 26 to Oct 13. The dashed line is the median (16,081).

011K22KJul 26: 17,665 viewsJul 28: 20,159 viewsJul 30: 16,112 viewsJul 31: 16,769 viewsAug 2: 21,618 viewsAug 3: 14,829 viewsAug 3: 16,713 viewsAug 5: 15,967 viewsAug 5: 18,682 viewsAug 6: 16,050 viewsAug 7: 17,975 viewsAug 9: 18,227 viewsAug 10: 16,290 viewsAug 10: 20,585 viewsAug 12: 22,322 viewsAug 18: 15,988 viewsAug 19: 18,280 viewsAug 21: 18,928 viewsAug 24: 18,208 viewsAug 27: 17,882 viewsAug 31: 14,354 viewsAug 31: 19,523 viewsSep 3: 18,888 viewsSep 7: 18,740 viewsSep 14: 15,268 viewsSep 15: 15,630 viewsSep 21: 16,585 viewsSep 25: 14,478 viewsSep 28: 13,582 viewsOct 4: 10,141 viewsOct 5: 10,423 viewsOct 8: 7,483 viewsOct 9: 6,744 viewsOct 9: 6,871 viewsOct 10: 6,763 viewsOct 11: 6,305 viewsOct 12: 5,916 viewsOct 12: 7,857 viewsOct 13: 6,936 viewsOct 13: 6,489 views Jul 26Oct 13
  • post views
  • median 16,081

Maximum: 22,322 views. Data as of Oct 18.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 6,553–7,346 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 17,975 views versus 16,050 for regular posts — 12% higher.

Based on 3 advertising and 37 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @seojob

Is the channel clean? What does the cleanliness index show?

The cleanliness index is 88 out of 100, grade A, level “metrics are normal.” The check found no deviations that would lower the index.

How many people will see a post in @seojob?

The median is about 16 thousand views with 389 thousand subscribers, ERR about 4.1%. A small share of the base sees the post.

Is it worth advertising here?

Placement is marked as controversial; the reason is the small share of subscribers who see posts. At the same time, ad posts get about 12% more views than regular ones.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-18
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @seojob assessment dated 2026-10-18 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 389,559 subscribers, median post views were 16,081, ERR was 4.1%, and the cleanliness index was 88/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.