TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @hmoffice

@hmoffice: statistics and cleanliness index

ХОУМ • Удалённая работа • Фриланс

ТОП 1 канал с вакансиями на Удалёнку. Только по вакансиям @workow Только по рекламе проектов @den_rek

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-28
Subscribers
247,988
Median views
2,310
ERR
0.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Job Listings
Post language Russian
Channel age 7 years

Data from 2026-09-28 — 10 days old.

Assessment summary

About 97% of deleted publications and a strong variance in views indicate continuous clearing of the feed, which conceals the actual history of audience interaction with the content.

With comments disabled and a weak response from the audience base, the reach forecast remains unreliable, so advertising risks failing to deliver the expected results.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.9% with 247,988 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: only a tiny fraction of the audience sees a post. Subscribers exist, but there are almost no views.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Channel content

🚩 Possible scam or deception signals

The feed regularly publishes suspicious offers promising easy money for likes and reviews, redirecting users to third-party bots.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 5 Job Listings catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 83,885 to 162,224 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 5 of 5
@hmoffice 0.9%
similar channels median 7.8%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jun 17 to Sep 28. The dashed line is the median (2,310).

016K32KJun 17: 6,662 viewsJun 18: 8,583 viewsJun 18: 9,176 viewsJun 19: 8,095 viewsJun 19: 7,072 viewsJun 19: 8,123 viewsJun 19: 10,739 viewsJun 19: 9,453 viewsJun 20: 9,632 viewsJun 20: 10,643 viewsJun 20: 12,329 viewsJun 20: 12,085 viewsJun 21: 12,228 viewsJun 21: 11,191 viewsJun 21: 12,893 viewsJun 21: 16,565 viewsJun 22: 19,227 viewsJun 22: 31,866 viewsSep 26: 2,494 viewsSep 26: 2,378 viewsSep 26: 2,243 viewsSep 27: 1,916 viewsSep 27: 1,919 viewsSep 27: 1,881 viewsSep 27: 2,010 viewsSep 27: 2,048 viewsSep 27: 1,983 viewsSep 27: 1,992 viewsSep 27: 2,008 viewsSep 27: 1,923 viewsSep 27: 1,883 viewsSep 28: 1,379 viewsSep 28: 1,298 viewsSep 28: 1,300 viewsSep 28: 1,350 viewsSep 28: 1,280 viewsSep 28: 1,048 viewsSep 28: 900 viewsSep 28: 681 viewsSep 28: 259 views Jun 17Sep 28
  • post views
  • 12 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 2,310

Maximum: 31,866 views. Data as of Sep 28.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.9% with 247,988 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: only a tiny fraction of the audience sees a post. Subscribers exist, but there are almost no views.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 14: index 35, grade FJun 14Sep 28: index 35, grade FSep 28

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 10 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 5 posts.

Questions about @hmoffice

What is the risk of placing ads in the @hmoffice channel?

The channel received a risk score of 65 out of 100 (red level), and the feasibility of placement is considered questionable. The ad post reach forecast here is unreliable due to unstable metrics.

What is the actual reach of posts in the channel?

With a base of almost 248 thousand subscribers, posts gain an average of 2,310 views, meaning the reach rate is less than 1%. Only an insignificant portion of the listed audience reads the feed.

Why is the verdict on ad placement questionable?

Views fluctuate significantly from post to post, and about 97% of posts are deleted from the channel. In such conditions, it is impossible to calculate the actual reach and ROI of the integration in advance.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-28
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @hmoffice assessment dated 2026-09-28 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 247,988 subscribers, median post views were 2,310, ERR was 0.9%, and the cleanliness index was 35/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.