TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel

@sektakai: statistics and cleanliness index

kai angel🤫

kai@fmtjetlag.io

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-01
Subscribers
308,837
Median views
195,620
ERR
63.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Music

Data from 2026-09-01 — 38 days old.

Assessment summary

The musician's personal blog focuses on interacting with a dedicated fandom; however, with a publishing intensity exceeding 13 posts per day, an ad post will quickly get lost in the feed.

An additional risk factor is the unnaturally flat views dynamic with a coefficient of variation of 0.10 against the backdrop of a twofold drop in median reach over the past month.

What to pay attention to

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.10)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 12 Music catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 19 to 59,442 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 8 of 12
@sektakai 63.3%
similar channels median 23.1%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 12 of 12
@sektakai 9.35
similar channels median 2.9

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 24 to Aug 27. The dashed line is the median (195,620).

0147K294KAug 24: 226,823 viewsAug 24: 237,993 viewsAug 25: 208,804 viewsAug 25: 203,453 viewsAug 25: 203,167 viewsAug 25: 194,915 viewsAug 25: 197,660 viewsAug 25: 194,355 viewsAug 25: 193,824 viewsAug 25: 199,288 viewsAug 25: 200,022 viewsAug 25: 198,097 viewsAug 25: 294,277 viewsAug 25: 199,138 viewsAug 25: 205,207 viewsAug 25: 191,641 viewsAug 25: 196,326 viewsAug 25: 187,758 viewsAug 25: 196,798 viewsAug 25: 194,039 viewsAug 25: 191,934 viewsAug 25: 190,627 viewsAug 25: 194,594 viewsAug 25: 197,916 viewsAug 25: 187,070 viewsAug 25: 188,956 viewsAug 25: 183,558 viewsAug 25: 185,189 viewsAug 25: 213,391 viewsAug 25: 185,663 viewsAug 25: 185,758 viewsAug 25: 185,058 viewsAug 25: 185,308 viewsAug 25: 189,028 viewsAug 25: 190,734 viewsAug 25: 197,924 viewsAug 25: 205,171 viewsAug 25: 239,160 viewsAug 25: 228,828 viewsAug 27: 192,478 views Aug 24Aug 27
  • post views
  • median 195,620

Maximum: 294,277 views. Data as of Sep 1.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.10)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 28: index 94, grade A+Jul 28Sep 1: index 70, grade BSep 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 161,693–172,753 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @sektakai

What is the channel's risk level regarding artificial boosting?

The channel received a risk score of 30 out of 100 (green zone), but the algorithms detected an abnormally even distribution of views between posts (CV 0.10), which can sometimes indicate partial artificial boosting.

What reach and engagement does the audience demonstrate?

The median reach is about 195.6k views (ERR ≈ 63.3%) with a high reaction rate (9.35%), although over the past 34 days the median views decreased from 390.7k.

Why is the feasibility of ad placement considered questionable?

The channel publishes an average of over 13 posts per day, turning the feed into a conveyor belt, causing an ad post to quickly be pushed down and potentially fail to gain the expected attention.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @sektakai assessment dated 2026-09-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 308,837 subscribers, median post views were 195,620, ERR was 63.3%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.