TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @Saint_petersburg_95

@Saint_petersburg_95: statistics and cleanliness index

𝑆𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑃𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑏𝑢𝑟𝑔 ☕️

روی ستاره‌ها، دوباره همو ملاقات می‌کنیم☆

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-03
Subscribers
87
Median views
65
ERR
74.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs
Post language Persian 67% of posts
Channel age 1 year

Data from 2026-10-03 — 35 days old.

Assessment summary

A personal blog with aesthetic photos, quotes, and short notes in Persian.

A significant share of subscribers views the posts, although the ERR of 74.7% is below the median of similar blogs in the catalog (120.9%). Some messages in the channel's history have been deleted (around 96% of IDs are missing), and due to the niche format, reach is limited to about 65 views.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈96% of IDs are missing

There are many gaps in the channel's recent message numbering, indicating that some of them have been deleted. This counts message IDs rather than posts: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones provide only a partial picture of the channel.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 24 Blogs catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 29 to 249 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 15 of 24
@Saint_petersburg_95 74.7%
similar channels median 129.7%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 13 of 23
@Saint_petersburg_95 4.62
similar channels median 4.88

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 14 to Oct 3. The dashed line is the median (65).

062125Sep 14: 54 viewsSep 14: 48 viewsSep 15: 53 viewsSep 15: 45 viewsSep 15: 30 viewsSep 16: 47 viewsSep 16: 48 viewsSep 16: 61 viewsSep 16: 59 viewsSep 16: 57 viewsSep 17: 62 viewsSep 17: 57 viewsSep 17: 76 viewsSep 17: 68 viewsSep 17: 78 viewsSep 17: 78 viewsSep 17: 71 viewsSep 18: 63 viewsSep 18: 125 viewsSep 19: 82 viewsSep 19: 76 viewsSep 19: 87 viewsSep 21: 94 viewsSep 22: 90 viewsSep 22: 84 viewsSep 22: 82 viewsSep 22: 80 viewsSep 22: 83 viewsSep 22: 81 viewsSep 23: 86 viewsSep 23: 96 viewsSep 23: 93 viewsSep 23: 95 viewsSep 28: 55 viewsSep 29: 44 viewsSep 29: 45 viewsSep 29: 45 viewsSep 29: 34 viewsSep 30: 33 viewsOct 3: 4 views Sep 14Oct 3
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 65

Maximum: 125 views. Data as of Oct 3.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 17: index 50, grade DSep 17Oct 3: index 94, grade A+Oct 3

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @Saint_petersburg_95

What is the channel's cleanliness score, and are there any concerns?

The cleanliness score is 94 out of 100 (grade A+, "metrics normal" level). The only noted peculiarity is that some messages have been deleted (around 96% of IDs are missing).

What reach do posts get in @Saint_petersburg_95?

The median reach per post is 65 views with 87 subscribers (ERR around 74.7%). This is lower than the median of the peer group of similar blogs in the catalog, which stands at 120.9%.

Is buying ads in this channel justified?

Placing ads is considered justified, as the ratio of views to reactions appears natural. However, the absolute reach of the ad will remain small due to the channel's modest size.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-03
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Saint_petersburg_95 assessment dated 2026-10-03 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 87 subscribers, median post views were 65, ERR was 74.7%, and the cleanliness index was 94/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.