روی ستارهها، دوباره همو ملاقات میکنیم☆
checked 2026-09-17
- Subscribers
- 92
- Median views
- 43
- ERR
- 46.7%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
With a tiny base of 92 subscribers, 91% of messages have been deleted from the channel's history, which, along with closed comments, indicates a potential feed cleanup or reach manipulation. A median of 43 views yields a high ERR of around 47%, but at this scale, metrics are easy to fake manually. Placement is questionable: the commercial value of a micro-channel with an opaque history is minimal.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 12 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 39 to 274 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-17
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @Saint_petersburg_95 assessment dated 2026-09-17 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 92 subscribers, median post views were 43, ERR was 46.7%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
Not enough posts for a forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 2 more are too fresh.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
It seems some posts have been deleted (≈91% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. Often, completed ad placements are hidden this way to conceal their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is indirect (posts are also deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 8 to Sep 17. The dashed line is the median (43).
- post views
- 5 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 43
Maximum: 115 views. Data as of Sep 17.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Forwarding links
@Saint_petersburg_95 forwards posts from
- @iestade check in the botcheck
- @nile_moon check in the botcheck
- @ocbooks check in the botcheck
- @thisisfuckinggreen check in the botcheck
Also from 2 private channels with no public name.
Data from 2026-09-17 — 3 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @Saint_petersburg_95 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @Saint_petersburg_95Questions about @Saint_petersburg_95
What is the risk level of this channel?
The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 (yellow zone) with low confidence due to the small audience of 92 subscribers. Placement is considered questionable due to the likelihood of artificial views.
What is the actual post reach?
Publications get an average of 43 views, which accounts for about 47% of the subscriber count. However, over 90% of past messages have been deleted, making it impossible to track metric consistency over time.
Is it worth buying ads on this channel?
Buying ads is considered questionable due to the risk of partially inflated views and extremely low reach. Investing in a channel with an audience under 100 people is unlikely to yield noticeable results.
Similar channels in Blogs
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.