TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @uzbekdusha

Fake engagement check for @uzbekdusha

O‘ZBEGIM — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-16.

Сизнинг ҳисларингиз бизнинг овозимиз. Реклама — t.me/prozbegim

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-16
Subscribers
15,935
Median views
2,293
ERR
14.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Psychology & Relationships
Post language Belarusian 62% of posts
Channel age 1 year

Assessment summary

A synchronous increase in views on older publications by 10.9% per day indicates artificial retroactive boosting. An influx of 2,500 subscribers over 11 days had no effect on views, which remained stagnant at around 2,300, while the deletion of 86% of posts and an inactive feed for over 6 days make ad placement risky.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 checked Psychology & Relationships channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 19 to 740,589 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 5 of 6
14.4% for @uzbekdusha similar channels median: 25.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 6 of 6
1.52 for @uzbekdusha similar channels median: 4.04

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-16
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @uzbekdusha assessment dated 2026-09-16 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 15,935 subscribers, median post views were 2,293, ERR was 14.4%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 1,739–2,630 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

Older posts gained views simultaneously (+10.9% per day)

Since the last check, views on 10 mature posts increased almost identically — all gained views, not just a few successful ones. Organic reach doesn't work this way: a post gains most of its traction within the first two days, and long-tail views are distributed unevenly. A uniform increase across the entire feed looks like purchased views delivered retroactively.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 31 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (2,293).

02.7K5.5KAug 31: 2,104 viewsAug 31: 1,927 viewsSep 1: 2,180 viewsSep 1: 2,088 viewsSep 1: 2,060 viewsSep 1: 2,108 viewsSep 1: 2,249 viewsSep 1: 2,338 viewsSep 1: 2,391 viewsSep 2: 2,495 viewsSep 3: 2,220 viewsSep 5: 2,049 viewsSep 5: 1,976 viewsSep 5: 2,036 viewsSep 5: 1,920 viewsSep 5: 1,882 viewsSep 5: 1,742 viewsSep 5: 1,647 viewsSep 5: 1,616 viewsSep 6: 1,816 viewsSep 6: 1,789 viewsSep 6: 2,475 viewsSep 6: 2,443 viewsSep 6: 2,518 viewsSep 6: 2,115 viewsSep 6: 2,101 viewsSep 6: 2,412 viewsSep 6: 2,502 viewsSep 6: 2,437 viewsSep 6: 3,448 viewsSep 6: 3,408 viewsSep 7: 3,045 viewsSep 7: 3,276 viewsSep 7: 3,245 viewsSep 7: 3,241 viewsSep 7: 5,235 viewsSep 7: 5,379 viewsSep 8: 5,482 viewsSep 8: 4,646 viewsSep 9: 3,539 views Aug 31Sep 9

Maximum: 5,482 views. Data as of Sep 16.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Older posts gained views simultaneously (+10.9% per day)

Since the last check, views on 10 mature posts increased almost identically — all gained views, not just a few successful ones. Organic reach doesn't work this way: a post gains most of its traction within the first two days, and long-tail views are distributed unevenly. A uniform increase across the entire feed looks like purchased views delivered retroactively.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @uzbekdusha

Data from 2026-09-16 — 4 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @uzbekdusha and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @uzbekdusha

Questions about @uzbekdusha

Is it safe to buy ads on this channel?

Ad placement is considered questionable. The risk score is 50 out of 100 due to signs of artificial reach boosting and regular deletion of publications.

What reach will the publication get?

The median reach is 2,293 views (ERR around 14.4%). However, these numbers may be distorted by boosting, and no new posts have been published for 6 days.

Why is the ad placement verdict questionable?

Older publications gain reach synchronously after the fact, about 86% of posts in the feed are deleted, and audience growth has not led to an increase in views.

Similar channels in Psychology & Relationships

All channels in Psychology & Relationships

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @uzbekdusha