Fake engagement check for @Plutonn134340
罰 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-26.
Behind every anonymous message, there's a story. ✉️ : @Plutonn134340_bot 18 • 19 🕊
Assessment summary
About 88% of recent publications on the channel have been deleted with comments completely disabled, which often masks deleted ad posts or volatile view counts. For a small creator blog with 997 subscribers, a median of 417 views looks high, but due to the massive feed cleanup, it is difficult to confirm audience stability. Therefore, ad placement is rated as questionable due to the possible presence of artificial traffic.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-26
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @Plutonn134340 assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 997 subscribers, median post views were 417, ERR was 41.8%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.
There are not enough posts for a reach forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts were found among the latest 40 posts, so there is nothing to compare.
What grade D means
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
What to pay attention to
Some posts appear to have been deleted (≈88% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad placements and conceal their actual reach. On its own, this is an indirect sign (posts are also deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 23 to Aug 26. The dashed line is the median (417).
- post views
- 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 417
The sample maximum is 712 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
The view-dispersion and maturation signals were available and found no deviations. This is not a guarantee: use the complete cleanliness index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @Plutonn134340Questions about @Plutonn134340
Why is the channel assigned a risk score of 50 out of 100?
The main risk factor is the deletion of approximately 88% of recent publications with disabled comments, indicating the likelihood of hidden inflation or feed manipulation.
What audience and reach does the channel get?
The channel has 997 subscribers with a median reach of 417 views per post (ERR ≈ 41.8%), but low assessment confidence requires traffic verification.
Is it advisable to buy ads on this platform?
Ad placement is marked as questionable: there is a risk that part of the views is artificial, and the sample lacks preserved ad posts to assess their performance.
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.