TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @retrospektivaru

Fake engagement check for @retrospektivaru

Детерминизм — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-02.

Канал посвящен размышлению о науке, её фактах, теориях, парадоксах, аксиомах и философскому познанию о мире. 🌐Админ(по всем вопросам): @idkdndk

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-02
Subscribers
470
Median views
206
ERR
43.8%
Posts sampled
27

Assessment summary

With a low posting frequency (one post every two days) and a complete absence of third-party ads, an advertisement will stay visible to readers for a long time without the risk of drowning in the feed. A high reaction rate indicates an active core audience; however, due to the channel's compact scale (median of around 200 views), placement will provide targeted contact with science enthusiasts rather than broad reach.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-02
Sample
The latest 27 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @retrospektivaru assessment dated 2026-09-02 uses 27 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 470 subscribers, median post views were 206, ERR was 43.8%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 27.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 27 posts with views, from Jul 5 to Sep 1. The dashed line is the median (206).

0153307Jul 5: 166 viewsJul 7: 89 viewsJul 10: 75 viewsJul 12: 73 viewsJul 13: 94 viewsJul 14: 112 viewsJul 16: 110 viewsJul 18: 130 viewsJul 20: 146 viewsJul 22: 192 viewsJul 25: 225 viewsJul 28: 229 viewsJul 30: 214 viewsAug 1: 245 viewsAug 3: 248 viewsAug 5: 288 viewsAug 8: 297 viewsAug 10: 307 viewsAug 13: 293 viewsAug 13: 294 viewsAug 16: 272 viewsAug 18: 262 viewsAug 21: 242 viewsAug 24: 206 viewsAug 26: 203 viewsAug 29: 119 viewsSep 1: 43 views Jul 5Sep 1

Maximum: 307 views. Data as of Sep 2.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @retrospektivaru

Data from 2026-09-02 — 18 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @retrospektivaru and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @retrospektivaru

Questions about @retrospektivaru

Are there risks of artificial inflation on this channel?

The deterministic check revealed no anomalies: the risk score is 0 out of 100, and views are distributed naturally. However, due to the small audience (470 subscribers), the analysis confidence is rated as low.

What reach will an advertising post receive?

You should expect a median of 206 views, which is about 44% of the total number of subscribers. Posts are published infrequently, so the ad will gather these views without being displaced by new content.

Is advertising placement justified?

Placement is considered justified thanks to a clean history without artificial inflation and the absence of ad clutter in the feed. The channel is suitable for inexpensive native advertising of educational or popular science projects.

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @retrospektivaru